Literature DB >> 20371785

Methotrexate withdrawal at 6 vs 12 months in juvenile idiopathic arthritis in remission: a randomized clinical trial.

Dirk Foell1, Nico Wulffraat, Lucy R Wedderburn, Helmut Wittkowski, Michael Frosch, Joachim Gerss, Valda Stanevicha, Dimitrina Mihaylova, Virginia Ferriani, Florence Kanakoudi Tsakalidou, Ivan Foeldvari, Ruben Cuttica, Benito Gonzalez, Angelo Ravelli, Raju Khubchandani, Sheila Oliveira, Wineke Armbrust, Stella Garay, Jelena Vojinovic, Ximena Norambuena, María Luz Gamir, Julia García-Consuegra, Loredana Lepore, Gordana Susic, Fabrizia Corona, Pavla Dolezalova, Angela Pistorio, Alberto Martini, Nicolino Ruperto, Johannes Roth.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Novel therapies have improved the remission rate in chronic inflammatory disorders including juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Therefore, strategies of tapering therapy and reliable parameters for detecting subclinical inflammation have now become challenging questions.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether longer methotrexate treatment during remission of JIA prevents flares after withdrawal of medication and whether specific biomarkers identify patients at risk for flares. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, open, multicenter, medication-withdrawal randomized clinical trial including 364 patients (median age, 11.0 years) with JIA recruited in 61 centers from 29 countries between February 2005 and June 2006. Patients were included at first confirmation of clinical remission while continuing medication. At the time of therapy withdrawal, levels of the phagocyte activation marker myeloid-related proteins 8 and 14 heterocomplex (MRP8/14) were determined. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to continue with methotrexate therapy for either 6 months (group 1 [n = 183]) or 12 months (group 2 [n = 181]) after induction of disease remission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was relapse rate in the 2 treatment groups; secondary outcome was time to relapse. In a prespecified cohort analysis, the prognostic accuracy of MRP8/14 concentrations for the risk of flares was assessed.
RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome revealed relapse within 24 months after the inclusion into the study in 98 of 183 patients (relapse rate, 56.7%) in group 1 and 94 of 181 (55.6%) in group 2. The odds ratio for group 1 vs group 2 was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.82-1.27; P = .86). The median relapse-free interval after inclusion was 21.0 months in group 1 and 23.0 months in group 2. The hazard ratio for group 1 vs group 2 was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.82-1.41; P = .61). Median follow-up duration after inclusion was 34.2 and 34.3 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Levels of MRP8/14 during remission were significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed flares (median, 715 [IQR, 320-1 110] ng/mL) compared with patients maintaining stable remission (400 [IQR, 220-800] ng/mL; P = .003). Low MRP8/14 levels indicated a low risk of flares within the next 3 months following the biomarker test (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with JIA in remission, a 12-month vs 6-month withdrawal of methotrexate did not reduce the relapse rate. Higher MRP8/14 concentrations were associated with risk of relapse after discontinuing methotrexate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN18186313.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371785     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  75 in total

Review 1.  Defining juvenile idiopathic arthritis remission and optimum time for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug withdrawal: why we need a consensus.

Authors:  Thomas Broughton; Kate Armon
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

Authors:  Ying Qian; Nisha R Acharya
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 3.  [Biomarkers for chronic inflammatory diseases].

Authors:  D Holzinger; D Föll
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  [Translational research in pediatric rheumatology. Current research approaches to the innate immune system].

Authors:  K Lippitz; J Waldkirch; C Kessel; G Varga; D Foell
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 5.  Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Arnd Heiligenhaus; Kirsten Minden; Dirk Föll; Uwe Pleyer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Attitudes and Approaches for Withdrawing Drugs for Children with Clinically Inactive Nonsystemic JIA: A Survey of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance.

Authors:  Daniel B Horton; Karen B Onel; Timothy Beukelman; Sarah Ringold
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 7.  Optimizing treatment in paediatric rheumatology--lessons from oncology.

Authors:  Tim Niehues
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  A Non-Peptidic S100A9 Specific Ligand for Optical Imaging of Phagocyte Activity In Vivo.

Authors:  Tom Völler; Andreas Faust; Johannes Roth; Michael Schäfers; Thomas Vogl; Sven Hermann
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: management and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Natasha M Ruth; Murray H Passo
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

10.  Low pretreatment levels of myeloid-related protein-8/14 and C-reactive protein predict poor adherence to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Mikel Alberdi-Saugstrup; Susan Nielsen; Pernille Mathiessen; Claus Henrik Nielsen; Klaus Müller
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.