Literature DB >> 20371686

A novel prognostic model for malignant mesothelioma incorporating quantitative FDG-PET imaging with clinical parameters.

Anna K Nowak1, Roslyn J Francis, Michael J Phillips, Michael J Millward, Agatha A van der Schaaf, Jan Boucek, Arthur W Musk, Melanie J McCoy, Amanda Segal, Peter Robins, Michael J Byrne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Existing prognostic systems for malignant pleural mesothelioma do not incorporate imaging information. We aimed to identify the contribution of quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) analysis to other prognostic variables in this disease. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma underwent helical thoracoabdominal computed tomography and FDG-PET scans at baseline. Patients were treated as clinically indicated and followed for survival. FDG-PET variables derived included total glycolytic volume, a composite of tumor volume and glycolytic activity.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were accrued from 2003 to 2006. Of 89 eligible assessable patients, 28 had undergone pleurodesis before enrolment. Seventeen patients remained alive at analysis; median survival is 15.4 months. On univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors were: total glycolytic volume on FDG-PET (P = 0.003), sarcomatoid histology (P < 0.0005), weight loss (P = 0.031), computed tomography stage (P = 0.015), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer good prognostic score (P = 0.049). In patients with epithelioid or biphasic histology, baseline total glycolytic volume remained predictive of survival in patients with (P = 0.01) or without (P = 0.018) previous pleurodesis. In multivariate analysis, no variable other than histology contributed to the model in patients with sarcomatoid histology; total glycolytic volume and weight loss contributed to the models in patients with nonsarcomatoid histology. computed tomography-assessed tumor-node-metastasis stage did not contribute to the model. A nomogram, which incorporates quantitative PET parameters and pleurodesis into prognostic information, is presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Sarcomatoid histology remains the strongest prognostic factor. In patients with non sarcomatoid disease, volumetric FDG-PET parameters are more predictive of survival than tumor-node-metastasis staging, suggesting that tumor volume and glycolytic activity may be more important determinants of prognosis in malignant pleural mesothelioma than anatomic extent of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371686     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

Review 1.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update on diagnosis and treatment options.

Authors:  Sanjana Kondola; David Manners; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.031

2.  Radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: have we identified the appropriate selection tools?

Authors:  Nico van Zandwijk; Glen Reid; Anthony Linton; Steven Kao
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

3.  Biomarkers and prognostic factors for mesothelioma.

Authors:  Harvey I Pass
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

4.  Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a review of current management and a look to the future.

Authors:  Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

5.  Extrapleural pneumonectomy and extended pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center approach.

Authors:  Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

Review 6.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: predictors and staging.

Authors:  William G Richards
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  Volumetric assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 8.  The eighth TNM classification for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Lawek Berzenji; Paul E Van Schil; Laurens Carp
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

Review 9.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Nico van Zandwijk; Christopher Clarke; Douglas Henderson; A William Musk; Kwun Fong; Anna Nowak; Robert Loneragan; Brian McCaughan; Michael Boyer; Malcolm Feigen; David Currow; Penelope Schofield; Beth Ivimey Nick Pavlakis; Jocelyn McLean; Henry Marshall; Steven Leong; Victoria Keena; Andrew Penman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Lung volume measurements as a surrogate marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zacariah E Labby; Samuel G Armato; James J Dignam; Christopher Straus; Hedy L Kindler; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.