CONTEXT: Although glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has recently been incorporated as a diagnostic test by the American Diabetes Association, its validity needs to be established in Asian Indians in a community setting. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the validity of HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test in individuals with newly detected diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND SETTING: Community based randomized cross sectional study in urban Chandigarh, a city in north India, from April 2008 to August 2009. SUBJECTS:Subjects included 1972 subjects aged 20 yr or older. INTERVENTION: Intervention included an oral glucose tolerance test and glycated hemoglobin in all the subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Utility of HbA1c as a diagnostic method in newly detected diabetes mellitus subjects was evaluated. RESULTS: Using World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, 134 (6.7%) had newly detected diabetes mellitus, 192 (9.7%) known diabetes mellitus, 329 (16.6%) prediabetes, and 1317 (69.4%) were normal of 1972 people screened. Using only the ADA criteria, 38% people were underdiagnosed. An HbA1c level of 6.1% had an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% for diagnosing diabetes. A HbA1c level of 6.5% (+/-2 SD) and 7% (+/-2.7 SD) had sensitivity and specificity of 65 and 88% and 42 and 92%, respectively, with corresponding positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 75.2 and 96.5% and 90.4 and 94.4%, respectively, for diagnosis of newly detected diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: A HbA1c cut point of 6.1% has an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% and can be used as a screening test, and a cut point of 6.5% has optimal specificity of 88% for diagnosis of diabetes.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Although glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has recently been incorporated as a diagnostic test by the American Diabetes Association, its validity needs to be established in Asian Indians in a community setting. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the validity of HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test in individuals with newly detected diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND SETTING: Community based randomized cross sectional study in urban Chandigarh, a city in north India, from April 2008 to August 2009. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 1972 subjects aged 20 yr or older. INTERVENTION: Intervention included an oral glucose tolerance test and glycated hemoglobin in all the subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Utility of HbA1c as a diagnostic method in newly detected diabetes mellitus subjects was evaluated. RESULTS: Using World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, 134 (6.7%) had newly detected diabetes mellitus, 192 (9.7%) known diabetes mellitus, 329 (16.6%) prediabetes, and 1317 (69.4%) were normal of 1972 people screened. Using only the ADA criteria, 38% people were underdiagnosed. An HbA1c level of 6.1% had an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% for diagnosing diabetes. A HbA1c level of 6.5% (+/-2 SD) and 7% (+/-2.7 SD) had sensitivity and specificity of 65 and 88% and 42 and 92%, respectively, with corresponding positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 75.2 and 96.5% and 90.4 and 94.4%, respectively, for diagnosis of newly detected diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: A HbA1c cut point of 6.1% has an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 81% and can be used as a screening test, and a cut point of 6.5% has optimal specificity of 88% for diagnosis of diabetes.
Authors: S Achanta; R R Tekumalla; J Jaju; C Purad; R Chepuri; R Samyukta; S Malhotra; S B Nagaraja; A M V Kumar; A D Harries Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2013-11-04
Authors: Stefan Ehehalt; Susanna Wiegand; Antje Körner; Roland Schweizer; Klaus-Peter Liesenkötter; Carl-Joachim Partsch; Gunnar Blumenstock; Ulrike Spielau; Christian Denzer; Michael B Ranke; Andreas Neu; Gerhard Binder; Martin Wabitsch; Wieland Kiess; Thomas Reinehr Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 3.183