Literature DB >> 20371121

Comparison of adenoidectomy methods: examining with digital palpation vs. visualizing the placement of the curette.

Nebil Ark1, Hanifi Kurtaran, K Serife Ugur, Turker Yilmaz, Akin Altug Ozboduroglu, Cemil Mutlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adenoidectomy by defining the remnant volume and localization in nasopharynx, following being satisfied with completeness of removal of the adenoid tissue with digital palpation.
METHODS: A prospective study conducted on 99 patients undergoing adenoidectomy+/-tonsillectomy. The main mass of the patient's adenoid tissue was removed with a sharp adenoid curette without visualization and the surgeon was allowed to palpate the adenoid bed and repeat the curettage until satisfied with completeness of removal. Then nasopharynx was visualized with a laryngeal mirror for defining the anatomical localization of the residual adenoid tissue and curettage completed under indirect mirror visualization. The volumes of the adenoid tissue excised at both stages were measured.
RESULTS: By blunt curettage and digital palpation, only 20.2% of the patients (20) had no residual adenoid tissue. In patients who had residual adenoid tissue, the proportion of the median percentage of residual adenoid tissue to total adenoid tissue was 19.98% (range 3.22-50%). The anatomical localization of the residual adenoid tissue were, along the torus tubarius on either side of the nasopharynx in 9 (11.4%), on the pharyngeal roof near choanal openings in 64 (81%), along the torus tubarius on either side of the nasopharynx+on the pharyngeal roof near choanal openings in 5 (6.3%), and on the pharyngeal roof near choanal openings+on the posterior wall of nasopharynx in 1 (1.3%) patients. There was no difference found among surgeons in the percentage and the location of the residue left (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Digital palpation is not a dependable technique and visualization of the nasopharynx is crucial for a complete adenoidectomy. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371121     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

1.  Revision adenoidectomy in children: residual vs regrowth?

Authors:  Hassan A Elhassan; Gülpembe Bozkurt; I Emrah Emre
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of Transoral/Transnasal Endoscopic-Guided Adenoidectomy with Endoscopic Nasopharyngeal Inspection at the End of Curettage Adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Huseyin Yaman; Mehmet Memis; Ethem Ilhan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-09-11

3.  Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Kamil Gokce Tulaci; Erhan Arslan; Tugba Tulaci; Aziz Dinek; Hasmet Yazici
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Is transnasal endoscopic examination necessary before and after adenoidectomy?

Authors:  Yavuz Selim Yıldırım; Tayfun Apuhan; Fadlullah Aksoy; Bayram Veyseller; Orhan Ozturan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-06

5.  Video Nasoendoscopic-Assisted Transoral Adenoidectomy with the PEAK PlasmaBlade: A Preliminary Report of a Case Series.

Authors:  Chao-Yin Kuo; Yuan-Yung Lin; Hsin-Chien Chen; Cheng-Ping Shih; Chih-Hung Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Endoscopic Adenoidectomy in Children With Otitis Media With Effusion and Mild Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pasquale Capaccio; Sara Torretta; Givlia Anna Marciante; Paola Marchisio; Stella Forti; Lorenzo Pignataro
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.