AIM: to investigate whether increased physical exercise during the school day influenced subsequent cognitive performance in the classroom. METHOD: a randomized, crossover-design trial (two weeks in duration) was conducted in six mainstream primary schools (1224 children aged 8-11y). No data on sex was available. Children received a teacher-directed, classroom-based programme of physical exercise, delivered approximately 30 minutes after lunch for 15 minutes during one week and no exercise programme during the other (order counterbalanced across participants). At the end of each school day, they completed one of five psychometric tests (paced serial addition, size ordering, listening span, digit-span backwards, and digit-symbol encoding), so that each test was delivered once after exercise and once after no exercise. RESULTS: general linear modelling analysis demonstrated a significant interaction between intervention and counterbalance group (p<0.001), showing that exercise benefitted cognitive performance. Post-hoc analysis revealed that benefits occurred in participants who received the exercise intervention in the second but not the first week of the experiment and were also moderated by type of test and age group. INTERPRETATION:physical exercise benefits cognitive performance within the classroom. The degree of benefit depends on the context of testing and participants' characteristics. This has implications for the role that is attributed to physical exercise within the school curriculum.
RCT Entities:
AIM: to investigate whether increased physical exercise during the school day influenced subsequent cognitive performance in the classroom. METHOD: a randomized, crossover-design trial (two weeks in duration) was conducted in six mainstream primary schools (1224 children aged 8-11y). No data on sex was available. Children received a teacher-directed, classroom-based programme of physical exercise, delivered approximately 30 minutes after lunch for 15 minutes during one week and no exercise programme during the other (order counterbalanced across participants). At the end of each school day, they completed one of five psychometric tests (paced serial addition, size ordering, listening span, digit-span backwards, and digit-symbol encoding), so that each test was delivered once after exercise and once after no exercise. RESULTS: general linear modelling analysis demonstrated a significant interaction between intervention and counterbalance group (p<0.001), showing that exercise benefitted cognitive performance. Post-hoc analysis revealed that benefits occurred in participants who received the exercise intervention in the second but not the first week of the experiment and were also moderated by type of test and age group. INTERPRETATION: physical exercise benefits cognitive performance within the classroom. The degree of benefit depends on the context of testing and participants' characteristics. This has implications for the role that is attributed to physical exercise within the school curriculum.
Authors: Joseph E Donnelly; Charles H Hillman; Darla Castelli; Jennifer L Etnier; Sarah Lee; Phillip Tomporowski; Kate Lambourne; Amanda N Szabo-Reed Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Andy J Daly-Smith; Stephen Zwolinsky; Jim McKenna; Phillip D Tomporowski; Margaret Anne Defeyter; Andrew Manley Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2018-03-27
Authors: Álvaro Infantes-Paniagua; Ana Filipa Silva; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Hugo Sarmento; Francisco Tomás González-Fernández; Sixto González-Víllora; Filipe Manuel Clemente Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-05-21
Authors: Airton J Rombaldi; Valerie L Clark; Felipe F Reichert; Cora L P Araújo; Maria C Assunção; Ana M B Menezes; Bernardo L Horta; Pedro C Hallal Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 5.012