Literature DB >> 20370742

Accuracy of very low pretest probability estimates for pulmonary embolism using the method of attribute matching compared with the Wells score.

Jeffrey A Kline1, D Mark Courtney, Martin P Than, Kerstin Hogg, Chadwick D Miller, Charles L Johnson, Howard A Smithline.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Attribute matching matches an explicit clinical profile of a patient to a reference database to estimate the numeric value for the pretest probability of an acute disease. The authors tested the accuracy of this method for forecasting a very low probability of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in symptomatic emergency department (ED) patients.
METHODS: The authors performed a secondary analysis of five data sets from 15 hospitals in three countries. All patients had data collected at the time of clinical evaluation for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). The criterion standard to exclude VTE required no evidence of PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within 45 days of enrollment. To estimate pretest probabilities, a computer program selected, from a large reference database of patients previously evaluated for PE, patients who matched 10 predictor variables recorded for each current test patient. The authors compared the outcome frequency of having VTE [VTE(+)] in patients with a pretest probability estimate of <2.5% by attribute matching, compared with a value of 0 from the Wells score.
RESULTS: The five data sets included 10,734 patients, and 747 (7.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.5% to 7.5%) were VTE(+) within 45 days. The pretest probability estimate for PE was <2.5% in 2,975 of 10,734 (27.7%) patients, and within this subset, the observed frequency of VTE(+) was 48 of 2,975 (1.6%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 2.1%). The lowest possible Wells score (0) was observed in 3,412 (31.7%) patients, and within this subset, the observed frequency of VTE(+) was 79 of 3,412 (2.3%, 95% CI = 1.8% to 2.9%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Attribute matching categorizes over one-quarter of patients tested for PE as having a pretest probability of <2.5%, and the observed rate of VTE within 45 days in this subset was <2.5%. (c) 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20370742     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of multidetector computed tomography findings with clinical and laboratory data in pulmonary thromboembolism.

Authors:  Zuhal Gülşen; Pınar Nercis Koşar; Fatma Dilek Gökharman
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13

2.  Evaluation of the usefulness of a D dimer test in combination with clinical pretest probability score in the prediction and exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism by medical residents.

Authors:  Tarek Owaidah; Nahlah AlGhasham; Saad AlGhamdi; Dania AlKhafaji; Bandar ALAmro; Mohamed Zeitouni; Fawaz Skaff; Hazzaa AlZahrani; Adher AlSayed; Naser ElKum; Mahmoud Moawad; Ahmed Nasmi; Mohannad Hawari; Khalid Maghrabi
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-28

3.  Normal D-Dimer Plasma Level in a Case of Acute Thrombosis Involving Intramuscular Gastrocnemius Vein.

Authors:  Hany A Zaki; Amr Elmoheen; Abdallah M Elsafti Elsaeidy; Ahmed E Shaban; Eman E Shaban
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-04

Review 4.  Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update.

Authors:  Swaroopa Pulivarthi; Murali Krishna Gurram
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-10

5.  Personalized risk stratification through attribute matching for clinical decision making in clinical conditions with aspecific symptoms: The example of syncope.

Authors:  Monica Solbiati; James V Quinn; Franca Dipaola; Piergiorgio Duca; Raffaello Furlan; Nicola Montano; Matthew J Reed; Robert S Sheldon; Benjamin C Sun; Andrea Ungar; Giovanni Casazza; Giorgio Costantino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.