Literature DB >> 20370502

Aging is not a process of wear and tear.

Josh Mitteldorf1.   

Abstract

The idea that bodies wear out with age is so ancient, so pervasive, and so deeply rooted that it affects our thought in unconscious ways. Undeniably, many aspects of aging, e.g., oxidative damage, somatic mutations, and protein cross-linkage are characterized by increased entropy in biomolecules. However, it has been a scientific consensus for more than a century that there is no physical necessity for such damage. Living systems are defined by their capacity to gather order from their environment, concentrate it, and shed entropy with their waste. Organisms in their growth phase become stronger and more robust; no physical law prohibits this progress from continuing indefinitely. Indeed, some animals and many plants are known to grow indefinitely larger and more fertile through their lives. The same conclusion is underscored by experimental findings that various insults and challenges that directly damage the body or increase the rate of wear and tear have the paradoxical effect of extending life span. Hyperactive mice live longer than controls, and worms with their antioxidant systems impaired live longer than wild type. A fundamental understanding of aging must proceed not from physics but from an evolutionary perspective: The body is being permitted to decay because systems of repair and regeneration that are perfectly adequate to build and rebuild a body of ever-increasing resilience are being held back. Regardless of the reason for this retreat, it should be more fruitful to focus on signaling to effect the ongoing activity of systems of repair and regeneration than to attempt repair of the manifold damage left in the wake of their failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20370502     DOI: 10.1089/rej.2009.0967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rejuvenation Res        ISSN: 1549-1684            Impact factor:   4.663


  10 in total

1.  Integration of immunity with physical and cognitive function in definitions of successful aging.

Authors:  Patricia Griffin; Joshua J Michel; Kristy Huysman; Alison J Logar; Abbe N Vallejo
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 2.  Relationship of electrophilic stress to aging.

Authors:  Piotr Zimniak
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Testing predictions of the programmed and stochastic theories of aging: comparison of variation in age at death, menopause, and sexual maturation.

Authors:  N S Gavrilova; L A Gavrilov; F F Severin; V P Skulachev
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 4.  In Search of Rationality in Human Longevity and Immortality.

Authors:  Gopal C Bhar
Journal:  Mens Sana Monogr       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec

5.  Empirical Validation of a Hypothesis of the Hormetic Selective Forces Driving the Evolution of Longevity Regulation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Alejandra Gomez-Perez; Pavlo Kyryakov; Michelle T Burstein; Nimara Asbah; Forough Noohi; Tania Iouk; Vladimir I Titorenko
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Empirical verification of evolutionary theories of aging.

Authors:  Pavlo Kyryakov; Alejandra Gomez-Perez; Anastasia Glebov; Nimara Asbah; Luigi Bruno; Carolynne Meunier; Tatiana Iouk; Vladimir I Titorenko
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 7.  Longevity extension by phytochemicals.

Authors:  Anna Leonov; Anthony Arlia-Ciommo; Amanda Piano; Veronika Svistkova; Vicky Lutchman; Younes Medkour; Vladimir I Titorenko
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  The Aged Lower Urinary Tract: Deficits in Neural Control Mechanisms.

Authors:  Cara C Hardy
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  A novel classification system for evolutionary aging theories.

Authors:  Lucas S Trindade; Toshiro Aigaki; Alexandre A Peixoto; Alex Balduino; Ivana B Mânica da Cruz; Jonathan G Heddle
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Age-associated epigenetic drift: implications, and a case of epigenetic thrift?

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; James West; Stephan Beck
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 6.150

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.