Literature DB >> 20370477

Circadian and homeostatic variation in sustained attention.

Pablo Valdez1, Candelaria Ramírez, Aída García, Javier Talamantes, Juventino Cortez.   

Abstract

Human performance is modulated by circadian rhythms and homeostatic changes. Changes in efficiency in the performance of many tasks might be produced by variation in a basic cognitive process, such as sustained attention. This cognitive process is the capacity to respond efficiently to the environment during prolonged periods (from minutes to hours). There are three indices of sustained attention: general stability of efficiency, time on task stability, and short-term stability. The objective of this work was to analyze circadian and homeostatic influences on the indices of sustained attention. Participants were nine undergraduate female student volunteers (mean age 17.67 yrs, SD = 1.00, range 16-19 yrs) who attended school from 07:00-13:30 h, Monday to Friday. They were assessed while adhering to a modified 28 h constant-routine protocol during which feeding, room temperature, motor activity, and room illumination were controlled. Rectal temperature was recorded each minute, and indices of sustained attention were assessed hourly through a continuous performance task (CPT). General stability was measured as standard deviation of correct responses and reaction time, time on task stability was measured as the linear regression of correct responses and reaction time throughout the task, and short-term stability was measured as hit runs and error runs. Rectal temperature showed circadian variation; subjective somnolence and tiredness increased, while general performance and all indices of sustained attention declined throughout the 28 h recording session. General stability exhibited circadian variation, whereas time on task did not. Short-term stability showed circadian variations in short-error runs, long-error runs, and short-hit runs, but long-hit runs did not. There was a 26 sec short interval at the beginning of the task, characterized by a very high efficiency level of performance. Execution during this safe period was not affected by time awake and did not show circadian variation. Overall, these results suggest a dissociation of the effects of circadian and homeostatic factors on the indices of sustained attention. General stability, short- and long-error runs, and short-hit runs were modulated by both a homeostatic factor and a circadian effect, while long-hit runs and time on task stability were modulated only by a homeostatic factor and did not show circadian variation. There was also a 26 sec "safe period" that seems to be independent of circadian and homeostatic influences. These results suggest that performance at work deteriorates at the end of a shift due to a decrease in general stability, an increase in error runs, decrease of long-hit runs, and decline with time on task. Night shiftworkers are exposed to an additional deterioration of performance during the nighttime due to a decrease in general stability and an increase in error runs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20370477     DOI: 10.3109/07420521003765861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  15 in total

1.  Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  Continuous Re-Exposure to Environmental Sound Cues During Sleep Does Not Improve Memory for Semantically Unrelated Word Pairs.

Authors:  Kelly C Donohue; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  J Cogn Educ Psychol       Date:  2011-06-01

Review 3.  Cumulative neurobehavioral and physiological effects of chronic caffeine intake: individual differences and implications for the use of caffeinated energy products.

Authors:  Andrea M Spaeth; Namni Goel; David F Dinges
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Sleepiness and Cognitive Performance among Younger and Older Adolescents across a 28-Hour Forced Desynchrony Protocol.

Authors:  Lora J Wu; Christine Acebo; Ronald Seifer; Mary A Carskadon
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 5.  Suicide and sleep: Is it a bad thing to be awake when reason sleeps?

Authors:  Michael L Perlis; Michael A Grandner; Subhajit Chakravorty; Rebecca A Bernert; Gregory K Brown; Michael E Thase
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.609

6.  Circadian and wakefulness-sleep modulation of cognition in humans.

Authors:  Kenneth P Wright; Christopher A Lowry; Monique K Lebourgeois
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 7.  Time-of-day as a critical biological variable.

Authors:  Randy J Nelson; Jacob R Bumgarner; William H Walker; A Courtney DeVries
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 9.052

8.  Different types of errors in saccadic task are sensitive to either time of day or chronic sleep restriction.

Authors:  Barbara Wachowicz; Ewa Beldzik; Aleksandra Domagalik; Magdalena Fafrowicz; Magda Gawlowska; Justyna Janik; Koryna Lewandowska; Halszka Oginska; Tadeusz Marek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Influence of Shift Work on the Quality of Sleep and Executive Functions.

Authors:  Mojtaba Elhami Athar; Mohammad-Kazem Atef-Vahid; Ahmad Ashouri
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2020-06-24

10.  Correlations between Repeated Use of Dry Sauna for 4 x 10 Minutes, Physiological Parameters, Anthropometric Features, and Body Composition in Young Sedentary and Overweight Men: Health Implications.

Authors:  Robert Podstawski; Krzysztof Borysławski; Cain C T Clark; Dariusz Choszcz; Kevin J Finn; Piotr Gronek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.