Literature DB >> 20370444

Bone mineral densitometry in patients on hemodialysis: difference between genders and what to measure.

Lidija Orlic1, Zeljka Crncevic, Drasko Pavlovic, Luka Zaputovic.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and osteoporosis are important health problems. There is an interrelationship between osteoporosis and CKD. Bone densitometry is the "gold" standard in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Unfortunately, there are some problems with the interpretation of bone densitometry in CKD patients. The goal of this study was to determine bone mineral density (BMD) in CKD patients, to assess the difference between genders and different sites of bone densitometry correlation between BMD and laboratory parameters, and to assess the most optimal measuring site.
METHODS: We studied 134 hemodialysis (HD) patients (62 females, 72 males). The mean age was 56.4+/-12.4 years and the mean duration of HD was 54.4+/-60 months. BMD of the lumbar spine (posterior-anterior projection and lateral projection), hip (femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, total femur, the Ward's Triangle), and forearm (ultradistal (UD), middistal (MID), distal third portion, and total forearm) was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic Delphi apparatus). Values were expressed as BMD, T-score, and Z-score.
RESULTS: Females had lower values of BMD in all measurement points. There were no significant differences in T- and Z-scores of forearm between males and females. Age was in a positive correlation with lumbar spine BMD in males and females. There was a negative correlation with neck and forearm BMD in both groups. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) was also in negative correlation with hip and forearm BMD in both groups. The best correlation of BMD in different sites was between forearm and neck.
CONCLUSION: BMD data in CKD patients should be interpreted with caution and appendicular skeletal sites should be included in the evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20370444     DOI: 10.3109/08860221003611661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


  4 in total

1.  Loss of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score in elderly hemodialysis patients: a 2-year follow-up, prospective, single-centre study.

Authors:  Ludmila Brunerová; Petr Kasalický; Jana Verešová; Renata Lažanská; Jana Potočková; Ivan Rychlík
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Forearm bone mass predicts mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Lidija Orlic; Ivana Mikolasevic; Zeljka Crncevic-Orlic; Ivan Jakopcic; Josipa Josipovic; Drasko Pavlovic
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Hypocalcemia and bone mineral density changes following denosumab treatment in end-stage renal disease patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  C Thongprayoon; P Acharya; C Acharya; J Chenbhanich; T Bathini; B Boonpheng; K Sharma; K Wijarnpreecha; P Ungprasert; M L Gonzalez Suarez; W Cheungpasitporn
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Bone mineral density in Palestinian patients with end-stage renal disease and the related clinical and biochemical factors: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zaher Nazzal; Shahd Khader; Hiba Zawyani; Mazen Abdallah; Osama Sawalmeh; Zakaria Hamdan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.