Literature DB >> 2036929

Single vs. double stapling technique in colorectal surgery. A prospective randomized trial.

E Moritz1, D Achleitner, N Hölbling, K Miller, T Speil, F Weber.   

Abstract

Seventy patients after rectosigmoid resection were randomized to a rectal anastomosis either in the single or double stapling technique. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. A trend in favor of the double stapling technique was noted: 2.8 percent clinical leaks vs. 8.6 percent in the single stapling technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036929     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Modified double-stapling technique in low anterior resection for lower rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Harunobu Sato; Koutarou Maeda; Tsunekazu Hanai; Masahisa Matsumoto; Hiroyuki Aoyama; Hiroshi Matsuoka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Single versus double stapling anastomotic technique in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Z Radovanovic; T Petrovic; D Radovanovic; M Breberina; A Golubovic; D Lukic
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Rectoseminal vesicle fistula as a rare complication after low anterior resection: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Kentaro Nakajima; Masanori Sugito; Yuji Nishizawa; Masaaki Ito; Akihiko Kobayashi; Yusuke Nishizawa; Takanori Suzuki; Toshiyuki Tanaka; Toru Etsunaga; Norio Saito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Feasibility and impact on surgical outcomes of modified double-stapling technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Han Beom Lee; Jang Ho Cha; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Colorectal anastomosis using a novel double-stapling technique for lower rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Harunobu Sato; Koutarou Maeda; Tsunekazu Hanai; Hiroyuki Aoyama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Transvaginal low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A N Yücesoy; E Ercan Bülbül; R Bahat; C Cafer Köşkeroğlu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Outcomes of resection for rectal cancer in India: the impact of the double stapling technique.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Rajesh R Saoji; Savio G Barreto; Anagha C Kakade; Stephen D Waterford; Sanjay B Ahire; Fahim M Goliwale; Parul J Shukla
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Results of the double stapling procedure in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C G Fu; T Muto; T Masaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.540

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.