Tumoural specimens for forensic purposes: comparison of genetic alterations in frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

In certain circumstances, tumour tissue specimens are the only DNA resource available for forensic DNA analysis. However, cancer tissues can show microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity which, if concerning the short tandem repeats (STRs) used in the forensic field, can cause misinterpretation of the results. Moreover, though formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPET) represent a large resource for these analyses, the quality of the DNA obtained from this kind of specimen can be an important limit. In this study, we evaluated the use of tumoural tissue as biological material for the determination of genetic profiles in the forensic field, highlighting which STR polymorphisms are more susceptible to tumour genetic alterations and which of the analysed tumours show a higher genetic variability. The analyses were conducted on samples of the same tissues conserved in different storage conditions, to compare genetic profiles obtained by frozen tissues and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. The importance of this study is due to the large number of specimens analysed (122), the large number of polymorphisms analysed for each specimen (39), and the possibility to compare, many years after storage, the same tissue frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded. In the comparison between the genetic profiles of frozen tumour tissues and FFPET, the same genetic alterations have been reported in both kinds of specimens. However, FFPET showed new alterations. We conclude that the use of FFPET requires greater attention than frozen tissues in the results interpretation and great care in both pre-extraction and extraction processes.