PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of phosphate coating of acid-etched titanium on the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and new bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in a canine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium implants (2.2 3 4 mm) with acid-etched surfaces that were electrolytically phosphated or not were placed in 48 mandibular sites in six foxhounds. Tetracycline and calcein dyes were administered 1 week after implant placement and 1 week before sacrifice. At 12 weeks after implant placement, the animals were sacrificed. MAR and BIC were evaluated using fluorescence microscopy. Light microscopic and histologic evaluations were performed on undecalcified sections. RESULTS: Microscopic evaluation showed the presence of healthy osteoblasts lining bone surfaces near implants. Similar BIC was observed in phosphated and nonphosphated titanium implant sites. MAR was significantly higher around the nonphosphated titanium implant surfaces than around the phosphated titanium samples. No significant differences were found between dogs or implant sites. CONCLUSION: Acid-etched implants showed significantly higher MARs compared to acid-etched, phosphate-coated implants. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:278-286.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of phosphate coating of acid-etched titanium on the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and new bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in a canine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Titanium implants (2.2 3 4 mm) with acid-etched surfaces that were electrolytically phosphated or not were placed in 48 mandibular sites in six foxhounds. Tetracycline and calcein dyes were administered 1 week after implant placement and 1 week before sacrifice. At 12 weeks after implant placement, the animals were sacrificed. MAR and BIC were evaluated using fluorescence microscopy. Light microscopic and histologic evaluations were performed on undecalcified sections. RESULTS: Microscopic evaluation showed the presence of healthy osteoblasts lining bone surfaces near implants. Similar BIC was observed in phosphated and nonphosphated titanium implant sites. MAR was significantly higher around the nonphosphated titanium implant surfaces than around the phosphated titanium samples. No significant differences were found between dogs or implant sites. CONCLUSION: Acid-etched implants showed significantly higher MARs compared to acid-etched, phosphate-coated implants. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:278-286.
Authors: Péter Borbély; Miklós P Dunay; Britta A Jung; Heinrich Wehrbein; Wilfried Wagner; Martin Kunkel Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: J D Bumgardner; J G Boring; R C Cooper; C Gao; S Givaruangsawat; J A Gilbert; C M Misch; D E Steflik Journal: Implant Dent Date: 2000 Impact factor: 2.454
Authors: Arthur B Novaes; Sérgio L S Souza; Paulo T de Oliveira; Adriana M M S Souza Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Ioannis K Karoussis; Giovanni E Salvi; Lisa J A Heitz-Mayfield; Urs Brägger; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Niklaus P Lang Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: G Castillo-Dalí; R Castillo-Oyagüe; A Batista-Cruzado; C López-Santos; A Rodríguez-González-Elipe; J-L Saffar; C-D Lynch; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez; D Torres-Lagares Journal: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Date: 2017-03-01
Authors: Jeanne-Marie Damerau; Susanne Bierbaum; Daniel Wiedemeier; Paula Korn; Ralf Smeets; Gregor Jenny; Johanna Nadalini; Bernd Stadlinger Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.405