| Literature DB >> 20368933 |
Gillian Lindzon1, Deborah L O'Connor.
Abstract
Folate has received international attention regarding its role in the risk-reduction of birth defects, specifically neural tube defects (NTDs). In 1998, health officials in Canada, like the United States, mandated the addition of folic acid to white flour and select grain products to increase the folate intake of reproductive-aged women. Subsequent to this initiative there has been an increase in blood folate concentrations in Canada and a 50% reduction in NTDs. Many countries, including Korea, have not mandated folic acid fortification of their food supply. Reasons vary but often include concern over the masking of vitamin B(12) deficiency, a belief that folate intakes among womenare adequate, low priority relative to other domestic issues, and the philosophy that individuals have the right not to consume supplemental folic acid if they so choose. Prior to folic acid fortification of the food supply in Canada, the folate intakes of women were low, and their blood folate concentrations while not sufficiently low to produce overt signs of folate deficiency (eg. anemia) were inconsistent with a level known to reduce the risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy. The purpose of this article is to describe the role of folate during the periconceptional period, pregnancy, and during lactation. The rationale for, and history of recommending folic acid-containing supplements during the periconceptional period and pregnancy is described as is folic acid fortification of the food supply. The impact of folic acid fortification in Canada is discussed, and unresolved issues associated with this policy described. While the incidence of NTDs in Canada pre-folic acid fortification were seemingly higherthan that of Korea today, blood folate levels of Korean women are strikingly similar. We will briefly explore these parallels in an attempt to understand whether folic acid fortification of the food supply in Korea might be worth consideration.Entities:
Keywords: Folic acid; fortification; lactation; periconceptional period; pregnancy
Year: 2007 PMID: 20368933 PMCID: PMC2849017 DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2007.1.3.163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res Pract ISSN: 1976-1457 Impact factor: 1.926
Fig. 1The chemical structure of folic acid or pterolylmonoglutamic acid. Other folate forms are denoted by the "R"-substitutions found in the box.
Fig. 2Simplified diagram of intracellular folate metabolism involving DNA biosynthesis and methylation. THF, tetrahydrofolate; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; CpG, Cytosine-guanine dinucleotide sequence; CH3 , methyl group; DNMT(1, 3a, 3b), DNA methyltransferases; MTR, methionine synthase; MTRR, methionine synthase reductase; TS, Thymidylate synthase; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; dUMP, deoxyuridine monophosphate; dTMP, deoxythymidine monophosphate; SHMT, serine hydroxymethyltransferase; CBS, cystathionine β-synthase [diagram modified with permission (Kim, 2004a; Sohn et al., 2004)]
Estimated Average Requirements (EAR) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for folate for adults, pregnant and lactating women (Institue of Medicine, 1998)
1)Dietary Folate Equivalents
Fig. 3Quarterly prevalence of open neural tube defects(upper), spina bifida(middle), and anencephaly (lower) before and after (vertical dashed lines) folic acid food fortification. [reprinted with permission (Ray et al., 2002a)]
Major contributors of folate (µg, uncorrected for bioavailability) in the diets of a sample of Canadian pregnant (n=61) and lactating women (n=60) (Sherwood et al., 2006)
Major contributors of folate (µg, uncorrected for bioavailability) in the diets of healthy Korean college females age 18-27 years (n=62) (Han et al., 2005)