Literature DB >> 2036830

Therapeutic impact of pulmonary artery catheterization in a medical/surgical ICU.

J S Steingrub1, G Celoria, M Vickers-Lahti, D Teres, W Bria.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the following: (1) if standard clinical evaluation is sufficient to provide an accurate estimate of hemodynamic status of unstable ICU patients; (2) the impact of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) on diagnosis and treatment plan; and (3) whether therapy provided after PAC was appropriate as judged by an expert panel of senior ICU physicians. A descriptive analysis of utilization of pulmonary artery catheters in a medical/surgical ICU population was performed in a university-affiliated hospital (24-bed medical/surgical ICU). The subjects included 154 medical/surgical patients judged by ICU residents and attendings to require PAC. All 154 patients underwent PAC with four patients having more than one catheterization. Prior to insertion of the catheter, a questionnaire was completed by medical/surgical residents and attendings indicating reasons for PAC insertion and estimate of hemodynamics. Following PAC, residents/attendings indicated their evaluation of hemodynamics and planned therapy. An expert panel rated performance of the house staff regarding treatment plan on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 indicating optimal therapy). The overall proportion correct classification for pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), CO, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were 47 percent, 51 percent, and 36 percent, respectively. In 45 percent of PAC, information obtained resulted in a major change in therapy. Major change in therapy occurred more often when prediction of PAWP by residents proved inaccurate. The expert panel judged appropriate scores of 3, 4 and 5 in 84 percent of the cases. Prediction of hemodynamics in ICU patients by clinical evaluation alone is inaccurate and unreliable. There is a positive correlation between inaccurate prediction of hemodynamics and major therapeutic changes after PAC. Most resident/attending performance was judged appropriate. Results of this study suggest that PAC was instrumental to the management scheme in many patients unresponsive to initial therapy. However, a subset of ICU patients were judged to have been managed favorably, yet had treatment based on inaccurate hemodynamic assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036830     DOI: 10.1378/chest.99.6.1451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  12 in total

1.  The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Francisco Javier Belda; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Mikhail Kirov; Julia Wendon; Roger Lussmann; Marco Maggiorini
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Identifying patients with ARDS: time for a different approach.

Authors:  D P Schuster
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for estimating cardiac index in critically ill patients: the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Geert Koster; Renske Wiersema; Yoran M Hummel; Pim van der Harst; Harold Snieder; Ruben J Eck; Thomas Kaufmann; Thomas W L Scheeren; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Anne Marie G A de Smet; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; A G Aya; G Saïssi; M Dauzat; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; J Ripart; F Ibanez; G Aya; P Peray; G Saïssi; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Clinical skills still provoke debate. Swan-Ganz catheter can help patients--but which ones?

Authors:  A P Steele
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

7.  Clinicians' abilities to estimate cardiac index in ventilated children and infants.

Authors:  S M Tibby; M Hatherill; M J Marsh; I A Murdoch
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Variability in interventions with pulmonary artery catheter data.

Authors:  Manu Jain; Michelle Canham; Daya Upadhyay; Thomas Corbridge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  [Evidence-based intensive care medicine. Practice, use and significance].

Authors:  J Graf; U Janssens
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Hadian; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.