Literature DB >> 20367586

Improving communication when seeking informed consent: a randomised controlled study of a computer-based method for providing information to prospective clinical trial participants.

Asuntha S Karunaratne1, Stanley G Korenman, Samantha L Thomas, Paul S Myles, Paul A Komesaroff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, with respect to participant understanding of information, of a computer-based approach to communication about complex, technical issues that commonly arise when seeking informed consent for clinical research trials. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An open, randomised controlled study of 60 patients with diabetes mellitus, aged 27-70 years, recruited between August 2006 and October 2007 from the Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology at the Alfred Hospital and Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne. INTERVENTION: Participants were asked to read information about a mock study via a computer-based presentation (n = 30) or a conventional paper-based information statement (n = 30). The computer-based presentation contained visual aids, including diagrams, video, hyperlinks and quiz pages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Understanding of information as assessed by quantitative and qualitative means.
RESULTS: Assessment scores used to measure level of understanding were significantly higher in the group that completed the computer-based task than the group that completed the paper-based task (82% v 73%; P = 0.005). More participants in the group that completed the computer-based task expressed interest in taking part in the mock study (23 v 17 participants; P = 0.01). Most participants from both groups preferred the idea of a computer-based presentation to the paper-based statement (21 in the computer-based task group, 18 in the paper-based task group).
CONCLUSIONS: A computer-based method of providing information may help overcome existing deficiencies in communication about clinical research, and may reduce costs and improve efficiency in recruiting participants for clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20367586     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  14 in total

1.  Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Babette Brumback; Janice L Krieger; Kenneth W Goodman; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Quality of communication in the ICU and surrogate's understanding of prognosis.

Authors:  Jared Chiarchiaro; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Discussions of cancer clinical trials with the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.

Authors:  Margaret M Byrne; Julie Kornfeld; Robin Vanderpool; Marc Belanger
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-12-12

4.  Decision aids for organ transplant candidates.

Authors:  Elisa J Gordon; Michael G Ison
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Melissa Constantine; David Magnus; Kathryn M Porter; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Michael Green; Nancy E Kass; Benjamin S Wilfond; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Long-Term Recall of Elements of Informed Consent: A Pilot Study Comparing Traditional and Computer-Based Consenting.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Richard Berg; Carol Waudby; Wendy Foth; Terrie Kitchner; Deanna Cross
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

7.  Informed consent: Are we doing enough?

Authors: 
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2010-10

Review 8.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Cynthia Fraser; Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Catherine Jackson; Tyna K Taskila; Heidi Gardner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-22

9.  Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; David W Klein; Helen A Schartz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Pauline Lockhart; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan A Cook; Monica Kjeldstrøm; Marit Johansen; Taina K Taskila; Frank M Sullivan; Sue Wilson; Catherine Jackson; Ritu Jones; Elizabeth D Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.