Literature DB >> 20367363

Surgical nuances for removal of retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas via the transbasal subfrontal translamina terminalis approach.

James K Liu1, Lana D Christiano, Gaurav Gupta, Peter W Carmel.   

Abstract

Giant craniopharyngiomas in the retrochiasmatic space are challenging tumors, given the location and surrounding vital structures. Surgical removal remains the first line of therapy and offers the best chance of cure. For tumors with extension into the retrochiasmatic space, the authors use the translamina terminalis corridor via the transbasal subfrontal approach. Although the lamina terminalis can be accessed via anterolateral approaches (pterional or orbitozygomatic), the surgical view of the optic chiasm is oblique and prevents adequate visualization of the ipsilateral wall of the third ventricle. The transbasal subfrontal approach, on the other hand, offers the major advantage of direct midline orientation and access to the third ventricle through the lamina terminalis. This provides the significant advantage of visualization of both walls of the third ventricle and hypothalamus as well as inferior midline access to the interpeduncular cistern to permit safe neurovascular dissection and total tumor removal. In this report, the authors describe the transbasal subfrontal translamina terminalis approach, with specific emphasis on technical surgical nuances in removing retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas. An illustrative video demonstrating the technique is also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20367363     DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  8 in total

Review 1.  Anatomic study of the lamina terminalis: neurosurgical relevance in approaching lesions within and around the third ventricle.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Ha Son Nguyen; Marios Loukas; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Approach selection and outcomes of craniopharyngioma resection: a single-institute study.

Authors:  Cao Lei; Li Chuzhong; Liu Chunhui; Zhao Peng; Bai Jiwei; Wang Xinsheng; Zhang Yazhuo; Gui Songbai
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Comparison of Outcomes following Primary and Repeat Resection of Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Alexander A Aabedi; Jacob S Young; Ryan R L Phelps; Ethan A Winkler; Michael W McDermott; Philip V Theodosopoulos
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-09-10

Review 4.  Microsurgical removal of craniopharyngioma: endoscopic and transcranial techniques for complication avoidance.

Authors:  Saira Alli; Semra Isik; James T Rutka
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Surgical strategies in childhood craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Jörg Flitsch; Hermann Lothar Müller; Till Burkhardt
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Indication and limitations of endoscopic extended transsphenoidal surgery for craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Takayuki Matsuo; Kensaku Kamada; Tsuyoshi Izumo; Izumi Nagata
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for retrochiasmatic craniopharyngioma: Surgical technique and results.

Authors:  Suresh K Sankhla; Narayan Jayashankar; Ghulam M Khan
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

8.  Removal of craniopharyngioma via fronto-basal interhemispheric approach.

Authors:  Hongshun Xing; Hongbo Xing; Peiquan Hui; Bin Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.967

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.