Literature DB >> 20364896

Emotion-attention interactions in recognition memory for distractor faces.

Narayanan Srinivasan1, Rashmi Gupta.   

Abstract

Effective filtering of distractor information has been shown to be dependent on perceptual load. Given the salience of emotional information and the presence of emotion-attention interactions, we wanted to explore the recognition memory for emotional distractors especially as a function of focused attention and distributed attention by manipulating load and the spatial spread of attention. We performed two experiments to study emotion-attention interactions by measuring recognition memory performance for distractor neutral and emotional faces. Participants performed a color discrimination task (low-load) or letter identification task (high-load) with a letter string display in Experiment 1 and a high-load letter identification task with letters presented in a circular array in Experiment 2. The stimuli were presented against a distractor face background. The recognition memory results show that happy faces were recognized better than sad faces under conditions of less focused or distributed attention. When attention is more spatially focused, sad faces were recognized better than happy faces. The study provides evidence for emotion-attention interactions in which specific emotional information like sad or happy is associated with focused or distributed attention respectively. Distractor processing with emotional information also has implications for theories of attention. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20364896     DOI: 10.1037/a0018487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  17 in total

1.  Emotional distraction unbalances visual processing.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Priming by motivationally salient distractors produces hemispheric asymmetries in visual processing.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jane E Raymond; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-24

3.  Laboratory of the Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences Research Center of Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile.

Authors:  Boris Lucero; Chiara Saracini; María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Pablo Mendez-Bustos; Marco Mora
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-06-14

4.  Single nucleotide polymorphism heritability and differential patterns of genetic overlap between inattention and four neurocognitive factors in youth.

Authors:  Lauren Micalizzi; Leslie A Brick; Marisa E Marraccini; Chelsie E Benca-Bachman; Rohan H C Palmer; Valerie S Knopik
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2021-02

5.  Evaluative pressure overcomes perceptual load effects.

Authors:  Alice Normand; Frédérique Autin; Jean-Claude Croizet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  Disarming smiles: irrelevant happy faces slow post-error responses.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Gedeon O Deák
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-07-21

7.  Only irrelevant angry, but not happy, expressions facilitate the response inhibition.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jay Prakash Singh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Effects of Directed Attention on Subsequent Processing of Emotions: Increased Attention to Unpleasant Pictures Occurs in the Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Yuming Chen; Dandan Zhang; Donghong Jiang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-04

9.  The Effects of Low and High Levels of Sadness on Scope of Attention: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Hailu Wang; Ying Chen; Qin Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Isolating the Effects of Word's Emotional Valence on Subsequent Morphosyntactic Processing: An Event-Related Brain Potentials Study.

Authors:  Javier Espuny; Laura Jiménez-Ortega; David Hernández-Gutiérrez; Francisco Muñoz; Sabela Fondevila; Pilar Casado; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.