Literature DB >> 20363795

Inhibitory effect of biocides on the viable masses and matrices of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

K Toté1, T Horemans, D Vanden Berghe, L Maes, P Cos.   

Abstract

Bacteria and matrix are essential for the development of biofilms, and assays should therefore target both components. The current European guidelines for biocidal efficacy testing are not adequate for sessile microorganisms; hence, alternative discriminatory test protocols should be used. The activities of a broad range of biocides on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were evaluated using such in vitro assays. Nearly all selected biocides showed a significant decrease in S. aureus biofilm viability, with sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid as the most active biocides. Only hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite showed some inhibitory effect on the matrix. Treatment of P. aeruginosa biofilms was roughly comparable to that of S. aureus biofilms. Peracetic acid was the most active on viable mass within 1 min of contact. Isopropanol ensured a greater than 99.999% reduction of P. aeruginosa viability after at least 30 min of contact. Comparable to results with S. aureus, sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide markedly reduced the P. aeruginosa matrix. This study clearly demonstrated that despite their aspecific mechanisms of action, most biocides were active only against biofilm bacteria, leaving the matrix undisturbed. Only hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite were active on both the biofilm matrix and the viable mass, making them the better antibiofilm agents. In addition, this study emphasizes the need for updated and standardized guidelines for biofilm susceptibility testing of biocides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20363795      PMCID: PMC2869147          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02095-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  25 in total

1.  Antibiotic and biocide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus.

Authors:  M T Suller; A D Russell
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Biocide use and antibiotic resistance: the relevance of laboratory findings to clinical and environmental situations.

Authors:  A D Russell
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  An evaluation of the suitability of the European suspension test to reflect in vitro activity of antiseptics against clinically significant organisms.

Authors:  D N Payne; J R Babb; C R Bradley
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine diacetate and benzalkonium chloride against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its response to biocide residues.

Authors:  L Thomas; A D Russell; J-Y Maillard
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Cross-resistance between triclosan and antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by multidrug efflux pumps: exposure of a susceptible mutant strain to triclosan selects nfxB mutants overexpressing MexCD-OprJ.

Authors:  R Chuanchuen; K Beinlich; T T Hoang; A Becher; R R Karkhoff-Schweizer; H P Schweizer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistance?

Authors:  P Gilbert; D G Allison; A J McBain
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 7.  Susceptibility of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria to biocides: a perspective from the study of catheter biofilms.

Authors:  D J Stickler
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Development of a standard test to assess the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cells to disinfectants.

Authors:  Suzanne B I Luppens; Martine W Reij; Rob W L van der Heijden; Frank M Rombouts; Tjakko Abee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Dental unit waterlines: biofilms, disinfection and recurrence.

Authors:  T F Meiller; L G Depaola; J I Kelley; A A Baqui; B F Turng; W A Falkler
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 10.  Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance.

Authors:  G McDonnell; A D Russell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of antibiofilm effect of benzalkonium chloride, iodophore and sodium hypochlorite against biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa of dairy origin.

Authors:  Ankita Pagedar; Jitender Singh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 2.  Monitoring dental-unit-water-line output water by current in-office test kits.

Authors:  Sham Lal; Sim K Singhrao; Matt Bricknell; Mark Pearce; L H Glyn Morton; Waqar Ahmed; St John Crean
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  in vitro Activity of Hydrogen Peroxide and Hypochlorous Acid Generated by Electrochemical Scaffolds Against Planktonic and Biofilm Bacteria.

Authors:  Yash S Raval; Laure Flurin; Abdelrhman Mohamed; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Haluk Beyenal; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cigarette smoke increases Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation via oxidative stress.

Authors:  Ritwij Kulkarni; Swati Antala; Alice Wang; Fábio E Amaral; Ryan Rampersaud; Samuel J Larussa; Paul J Planet; Adam J Ratner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Antibiotic activity against naive and induced Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Nathalie M Vandevelde; Paul M Tulkens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Resveratrol, pterostilbene, and baicalein: plant-derived anti-biofilm agents.

Authors:  Irena Kolouchová; Olga Maťátková; Martina Paldrychová; Zdeněk Kodeš; Eva Kvasničková; Karel Sigler; Alena Čejková; Jan Šmidrkal; Kateřina Demnerová; Jan Masák
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  A combined pharmacodynamic quantitative and qualitative model reveals the potent activity of daptomycin and delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Julia Bauer; Wafi Siala; Paul M Tulkens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Clinical Evidence of Current Irrigation Practices and the Use of Oral Antibiotics to Prevent and Treat Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Jason Zlotnicki; Alexandra Gabrielli; Kenneth L Urish; Kimberly M Brothers
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Wound care antiseptics - performance differences against Staphylococcus aureus in biofilm.

Authors:  Lene K Vestby; Live L Nesse
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 10.  Antimicrobial stewardship of antiseptics that are pertinent to wounds: the need for a united approach.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Maillard; Günter Kampf; Rose Cooper
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.