Literature DB >> 20363788

Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the betaproteobacterial communities associated with different potato cultivars in two fields.

Ozgül Inceoğlu1, Joana Falcão Salles, Leo van Overbeek, Jan Dirk van Elsas.   

Abstract

Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere are dynamic and susceptible to changes in plant conditions. Among the bacteria, the betaproteobacteria play key roles in nutrient cycling and plant growth promotion, and hence the dynamics of their community structures in the rhizosphere should be investigated. Here, the effects of plant cultivar, growth stage, and soil type on the communities associated with potato cultivars Aveka, Aventra, Karnico, Modena, Premiere, and Désirée were assessed for two different fields containing sandy soil with either a high or low organic compound content. Thus, bacterial and betaproteobacterial PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analyses were performed to analyze the effects of plant cultivar and growth on the rhizosphere community structure. The analyses showed that in both fields all cultivars had a rhizosphere effect on the total bacterial and betaproteobacterial communities. In addition, the plant growth stage strongly affected the betaproteobacterial communities in both fields. Moreover, the community structures were affected by cultivar, and cultivars differed in physiology, as reflected in their growth rates, root development, and estimated tuber starch contents. Analyses of betaproteobacterial clone libraries constructed for two selected cultivars (one cultivar that produced low-starch-content tubers and one cultivar that produced high-starch-content tubers), as well as bulk soil, revealed that the rhizospheres of the two cultivars selected for specific bacteria, including plant-growth-promoting bacteria, such as Variovorax and Achromobacter spp. In addition, quantitative PCR-based quantification of the Variovorax paradoxus-specific functional gene asfA (involved in desulfonation) indicated that there were clear potato rhizosphere effects on the abundance of this gene. Interestingly, both cultivar type and plant growth stage affected the community under some circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20363788      PMCID: PMC2876460          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00040-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  35 in total

1.  PCR bias in ecological analysis: a case study for quantitative Taq nuclease assays in analyses of microbial communities.

Authors:  S Becker; P Böger; R Oehlmann; A Ernst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type, and crop development.

Authors:  G Wieland; R Neumann; H Backhaus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation by beta-proteobacteria is widespread in nature.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Chen; Lionel Moulin; Cyril Bontemps; Peter Vandamme; Gilles Béna; Catherine Boivin-Masson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Seasonal changes in the rhizosphere microbial communities associated with field-grown genetically modified canola (Brassica napus).

Authors:  Kari E Dunfield; James J Germida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients.

Authors:  H Heuer; M Krsek; P Baker; K Smalla; E M Wellington
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The role of Variovorax and other Comamonadaceae in sulfur transformations by microbial wheat rhizosphere communities exposed to different sulfur fertilization regimes.

Authors:  Achim Schmalenberger; Sarah Hodge; Anna Bryant; Malcolm J Hawkesford; Brajesh K Singh; Michael A Kertesz
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Soil Type and Maize Cultivar Affect the Genetic Diversity of Maize Root-Associated Burkholderia cepacia Populations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Effect of transferring 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth-promoting and disease-suppressive capacities.

Authors:  C Wang; E Knill; B R Glick; G Défago
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Changes in developing plant microbial community structure as affected by contaminated water.

Authors:  A M Ibekwe; C M Grieve
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments.

Authors:  G A Kowalchuk; J R Stephen; W De Boer; J I Prosser; T M Embley; J W Woldendorp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere.

Authors:  Laurent Philippot; Jos M Raaijmakers; Philippe Lemanceau; Wim H van der Putten
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Ecotoxicological assessment of pesticides and their combination on rhizospheric microbial community structure and function of Vigna radiata.

Authors:  Varsha Ashok Walvekar; Swati Bajaj; Dileep K Singh; Shilpi Sharma
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Lignin engineering in field-grown poplar trees affects the endosphere bacterial microbiome.

Authors:  Bram Beckers; Michiel Op De Beeck; Nele Weyens; Rebecca Van Acker; Marc Van Montagu; Wout Boerjan; Jaco Vangronsveld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conserving and enhancing biological control of nematodes.

Authors:  Patricia Timper
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  The parA Region of Broad-Host-Range PromA Plasmids Is a Carrier of Mobile Genes.

Authors:  Armando Cavalcante Franco Dias; Simone Raposo Cotta; Fernando Dini Andreote; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Structure and variation of root-associated microbiomes of potato grown in alfisol.

Authors:  Ayslu Mardanova; Marat Lutfullin; Guzel Hadieva; Yaw Akosah; Daria Pudova; Daniil Kabanov; Elena Shagimardanova; Petr Vankov; Semyon Vologin; Natalia Gogoleva; Zenon Stasevski; Margarita Sharipova
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Different bacterial populations associated with the roots and rhizosphere of rice incorporate plant-derived carbon.

Authors:  Marcela Hernández; Marc G Dumont; Quan Yuan; Ralf Conrad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Normal operating range of bacterial communities in soil used for potato cropping.

Authors:  Özgül Inceoglu; Leo Simon van Overbeek; Joana Falcão Salles; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Root exudates: from plant to rhizosphere and beyond.

Authors:  Vicente Vives-Peris; Carlos de Ollas; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; Rosa María Pérez-Clemente
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome.

Authors:  Derek S Lundberg; Sarah L Lebeis; Sur Herrera Paredes; Scott Yourstone; Jase Gehring; Stephanie Malfatti; Julien Tremblay; Anna Engelbrektson; Victor Kunin; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Robert C Edgar; Thilo Eickhorst; Ruth E Ley; Philip Hugenholtz; Susannah Green Tringe; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.