STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe current alcohol screening and brief intervention practices in emergency departments (EDs) at Level I and Level II trauma centers and characterize ED directors' attitudes and perceived barriers associated with these practices among injured patients in the ED. METHODS: ED directors at Level I and Level II trauma centers were surveyed about current alcohol screening and intervention practices in the ED, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to these practices. RESULTS: Nearly half (46.0%) of ED directors surveyed responded. The majority (64.5%) reported using a serum alcohol level to routinely screen for unhealthy alcohol use; only 23.6% routinely use standardized instruments. Sixty-five percent of ED directors support screening and 70% support intervention among injured ED patients. Only 15% reported having formal screening and intervention policies in their ED, and 9% reported offering brief alcohol intervention by trained personnel. The most commonly perceived barriers to implementation are provider time (83%) and financial resources (55%). Of injured patients identified as exhibiting alcohol misuse, few (12%) receive brief intervention conducted by trained personnel. CONCLUSION: Current alcohol screening and brief intervention practices are lagging behind national guidelines. Although the majority of ED directors support the idea of alcohol screening and intervention, these beliefs have not yet been translated to routine clinical care. Copyright (c) 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe current alcohol screening and brief intervention practices in emergency departments (EDs) at Level I and Level II trauma centers and characterize ED directors' attitudes and perceived barriers associated with these practices among injured patients in the ED. METHODS: ED directors at Level I and Level II trauma centers were surveyed about current alcohol screening and intervention practices in the ED, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to these practices. RESULTS: Nearly half (46.0%) of ED directors surveyed responded. The majority (64.5%) reported using a serum alcohol level to routinely screen for unhealthy alcohol use; only 23.6% routinely use standardized instruments. Sixty-five percent of ED directors support screening and 70% support intervention among injured ED patients. Only 15% reported having formal screening and intervention policies in their ED, and 9% reported offering brief alcohol intervention by trained personnel. The most commonly perceived barriers to implementation are provider time (83%) and financial resources (55%). Of injured patients identified as exhibiting alcohol misuse, few (12%) receive brief intervention conducted by trained personnel. CONCLUSION: Current alcohol screening and brief intervention practices are lagging behind national guidelines. Although the majority of ED directors support the idea of alcohol screening and intervention, these beliefs have not yet been translated to routine clinical care. Copyright (c) 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Patrick M Carter; Maureen A Walton; Manya F Newton; Michael Clery; Lauren K Whiteside; Marc A Zimmerman; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Megan L Ranney; Jonathan Fletcher; Harrison Alter; Christopher Barsotti; Vikhyat S Bebarta; Marian E Betz; Patrick M Carter; Magdalena Cerdá; Rebecca M Cunningham; Peter Crane; Jahan Fahimi; Matthew J Miller; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Jody A Vogel; Garen J Wintemute; Muhammad Waseem; Manish N Shah Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kamilla L Venner; Victoria Sánchez; Jacqueline Garcia; Robert L Williams; Andrew L Sussman Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2018 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Shahram Lotfipour; James Howard; Samer Roumani; Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont; Bharath Chakravarthy; Craig L Anderson; Jie W Weiss; Victor Cisneros; Brad Dykzeul Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2013-01-12 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Federico E Vaca; James Dziura; Fuad Abujarad; Michael V Pantalon; Allen Hsiao; Craig A Field; Gail D'Onofrio Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Brian Suffoletto; Jeffrey Kristan; Clifton Callaway; Kevin H Kim; Tammy Chung; Peter M Monti; Duncan B Clark Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Pilar M Sanjuan; Samara L Rice; Katie Witkiewitz; Raul N Mandler; Cameron Crandall; Michael P Bogenschutz Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.492