Literature DB >> 20363424

How to do pancreatic mass FNA.

Michael D Harris1, Jonathan M Buscaglia.   

Abstract

FNA is an important aspect in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic masses. Studies have shown that the overall accuracy of EUS-guided FNA ranges between 71% and 90% in this setting. It is important to review all pertinent clinical data (especially cross-sectional imaging) before performing endoscopy. The choice of needle may depend on the location and size of the lesion. Once the lesion is targeted and placed in optimal position, FNA is performed under total EUS guidance while visualizing the needle tip at all times. Factors that may increase the diagnostic yield of FNA include sampling the lesion in multiple planes, targeting the margins or firmer ends of a necrotic mass, and arranging for ROSE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20363424     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  3 in total

1.  Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Brandon S Walker; Kirsten Howard; Lester J Layfield; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Primary pancreatic plasmacytoma: a rare case report.

Authors:  Tao Lu; Hong Pu; Gaoping Zhao
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Difficult endoscopic diagnosis of a pancreatic plasmacytoma: Case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Nicolas Williet; Radwan Kassir; Muriel Cuilleron; Olivier Dumas; Leslie Rinaldi; Karine Augeul-Meunier; Michèle Cottier; Xavier Roblin; Jean-Marc Phelip
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.