Literature DB >> 20362913

Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population.

Souichiro Oda1, Kazuhito Arai, Rizako Nakahara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this research was to evaluate commercially available preformed archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms.
METHODS: Thirty mandibular dental casts were made of orthodontically untreated subjects with the most ideal occlusions, selected from among approximately 3500 students at Nippon Dental University. Canine and first-molar widths were measured on the dental casts with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Twenty preformed mandibular archwires were scanned by using a flatbed scanner. The archwire widths were measured at the level of the mean canine and first-molar depths, and then compared with the natural dental arch widths, considering bracket thickness, measured with a modified caliper. The results were statistically analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS: The preformed archwires that most closely matched the normal dental arch forms were the Orthos (Ormco, Glendora, Calif) and Vari-Simplex large (Ormco) types. The preformed archwires were significantly narrower than the normal dental arches at both the canine (P <0.05) and molar (P <0.01) levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The variations in current preformed archwires do not correspond entirely with various arch forms in a group with ideal occlusion. The most commonly used archwires are similar and can be considered imitations of the Roth arch form, which was designed primarily for extraction patients in the 1970s. Therefore, preformed archwires that are approximately 1 to 3 mm wider at the canine level and 2 to 5 mm wider at the first-molar level might be required for today's orthodontic needs. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362913     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Clinical Implications of Preformed Archwire Selection on the Treatment of Angle Class I/II division 1 Malocclusions in Thais.

Authors:  Kittipong Dacha; Pornrachanee Sawaengkit; Jiraporn Chaiwat; Montip Tiensuwan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

2.  Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees; Abdulmajeed M Al-Shujaa; Mohammad A Alqahtani; Ali S Aljhani
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Comparison of commercially available arch wires with normal dental arch in a group of Iranian population.

Authors:  Zohreh Hedayati; Farnaz Fakhri; Vahid Moshkel Gosha
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-06

4.  Determining shapes and dimensions of dental arches for the use of straight-wire arches in lingual technique.

Authors:  Silvana Allegrini Kairalla; Giuseppe Scuzzo; Tarcila Triviño; Leandro Velasco; Luca Lombardo; Luiz Renato Paranhos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

5.  Impact of the prefabricated forms of NiTi archwires on orthodontic forces delivered to the mandibular dental arch.

Authors:  Akihiko Tachi; Keisuke Tochigi; Naomi Saze; Kazuhito Arai
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Evaluation of arch width variations among different skeletal patterns in South Indian population.

Authors:  Mandava Prasad; Senny Thomas Kannampallil; Ashok Kumar Talapaneni; Suja Ani George; Sharath Kumar Shetty
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2013-01

7.  The effect of occlusogingival placement of clinical bracket points on the adaptation of a straight wire to the lingual arch form.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Abdi; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Ehsan Balaghi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.