Literature DB >> 20362894

Changes in esthetic standards since 1940.

Mirjam Berneburg1, Klaus Dietz, Claudia Niederle, Gernot Göz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goals of this study were to investigate differences between the most popular female and male faces, past and present, and to determine whether they had changed over time and, if so, to what extent.
METHODS: Internet film databases were searched for photographs of men and women who were considered attractive between 1940 and 2008. Images meeting defined inclusion criteria were compared. Measurements were taken on a minimum of 20 images per sex per decade. Intersex facial differences were grouped by decades, and we examined whether these differences remained stable or whether and how they changed over time.
RESULTS: The women had fuller and more protrusive lip profiles than did the men, particularly during the first decade of the 21st century. Significant sex-specific developments were noted over time with respect to chin lengths, frontonasal angles, and total face angles. The men had decreases in chin size and length, but a small opposite trend was observed in the women's faces. During the observation period, female and male faces considered highly attractive became slightly more similar in terms of chin position and size.
CONCLUSIONS: Notions of facial attractiveness might be influenced by developments in society. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362894     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Oral health-related quality of life after orthodontic treatment for anterior tooth alignment: Association with emotional state and sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Jana Kolenda; Helge Fischer-Brandies; Robert Ciesielski; Bernd Koos
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mousavi; Parinaz Saeidi Ghorani; Arash Deilamani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-24

3.  Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans.

Authors:  Martin Fink; Ursula Hirschfelder; Veronika Hirschinger; Matthias Schmid; Caroline Spitzl; Andreas Detterbeck; Elisabeth Hofmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Cintia Helena Zingaretti Junqueira; Lucas Marzullo Mendes; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Contemporary Koreans' Perceptions of Facial Beauty.

Authors:  Seung Chul Rhee; Soo-Jung An; Rahil Hwang
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-15

6.  Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.

Authors:  Parisa Salehi; Niloofar Azadeh; Negin Beigi; Mitra Farzin
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-03

7.  Facial Anthropometric Norms of the Young Iranian Population.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayat; Mahsa Shariati; Fatemeh Rajaeirad; Mir Saeed Yekaninejad; Fatemeh Momen-Heravi; Zeinab Davoudmanesh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-05-17

8.  Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes.

Authors:  Xiaonan Yu; Bin Liu; Yuru Pei; Tianmin Xu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.079

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.