OBJECTIVE: Currently, electroencephalography (EEG) cannot be used to record cortical activity during clinically effective DBS due to the presence of large stimulation artifact with components that overlap the useful spectrum of the EEG. A filtering method is presented that removes these artifacts whilst preserving the spectral and temporal fidelity of the underlying EEG. METHODS: The filter is based on the Hampel identifier that treats artifacts as outliers in the frequency domain and replaces them with interpolated values. Performance of the filter was tested with a synthesized DBS signal and actual data recorded during bilateral monopolar DBS. RESULTS: Mean increases in signal-to-noise ratio of 7.8dB for single-frequency stimulation and 13.8dB for dual-frequency stimulation are reported. Correlation analysis between EEG with synthesized artifacts and artifact-free EEG reveals that distortion to the underlying EEG in the filtered signal is negligible (r(2)>0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Frequency-domain Hampel filtering has been shown to remove monopolar DBS artifacts under a number of common stimulation conditions used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. SIGNIFICANCE: Application of frequency-domain Hampel filtering will allow the measurement of EEG in patients during clinically effective DBS and thus may increase our understanding of the mechanisms of action of this important therapeutic intervention. Copyright 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Currently, electroencephalography (EEG) cannot be used to record cortical activity during clinically effective DBS due to the presence of large stimulation artifact with components that overlap the useful spectrum of the EEG. A filtering method is presented that removes these artifacts whilst preserving the spectral and temporal fidelity of the underlying EEG. METHODS: The filter is based on the Hampel identifier that treats artifacts as outliers in the frequency domain and replaces them with interpolated values. Performance of the filter was tested with a synthesized DBS signal and actual data recorded during bilateral monopolar DBS. RESULTS: Mean increases in signal-to-noise ratio of 7.8dB for single-frequency stimulation and 13.8dB for dual-frequency stimulation are reported. Correlation analysis between EEG with synthesized artifacts and artifact-free EEG reveals that distortion to the underlying EEG in the filtered signal is negligible (r(2)>0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Frequency-domain Hampel filtering has been shown to remove monopolar DBS artifacts under a number of common stimulation conditions used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. SIGNIFICANCE: Application of frequency-domain Hampel filtering will allow the measurement of EEG in patients during clinically effective DBS and thus may increase our understanding of the mechanisms of action of this important therapeutic intervention. Copyright 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: A O Ceballos-Baumann; H Boecker; P Bartenstein; I von Falkenhayn; H Riescher; B Conrad; J R Moringlane; F Alesch Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1999-08
Authors: Colum D MacKinnon; Ruth M Webb; Paul Silberstein; Steven Tisch; Peter Asselman; Patricia Limousin; John C Rothwell Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: M C Rodriguez-Oroz; J A Obeso; A E Lang; J-L Houeto; P Pollak; S Rehncrona; J Kulisevsky; A Albanese; J Volkmann; M I Hariz; N P Quinn; J D Speelman; J Guridi; I Zamarbide; A Gironell; J Molet; B Pascual-Sedano; B Pidoux; A M Bonnet; Y Agid; J Xie; A-L Benabid; A M Lozano; J Saint-Cyr; L Romito; M F Contarino; M Scerrati; V Fraix; N Van Blercom Journal: Brain Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: T Hershey; F J Revilla; A R Wernle; L McGee-Minnich; J V Antenor; T O Videen; J L Dowling; J W Mink; J S Perlmutter Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-09-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: D Devos; E Labyt; P Derambure; J L Bourriez; F Cassim; N Reyns; S Blond; J D Guieu; A Destée; L Defebvre Journal: Brain Date: 2003-12-22 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Evan M Dastin-van Rijn; Nicole R Provenza; Jonathan S Calvert; Ro'ee Gilron; Anusha B Allawala; Radu Darie; Sohail Syed; Evan Matteson; Gregory S Vogt; Michelle Avendano-Ortega; Ana C Vasquez; Nithya Ramakrishnan; Denise N Oswalt; Kelly R Bijanki; Robert Wilt; Philip A Starr; Sameer A Sheth; Wayne K Goodman; Matthew T Harrison; David A Borton Journal: Cell Rep Methods Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Sara J Hanrahan; Joshua J Nedrud; Bradley S Davidson; Sierra Farris; Monique Giroux; Aaron Haug; Mohammad H Mahoor; Anne K Silverman; Jun Jason Zhang; Adam Olding Hebb Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2016-11-29
Authors: D J Caldwell; J A Cronin; R P N Rao; K L Collins; K E Weaver; A L Ko; J G Ojemann; J N Kutz; B W Brunton Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Evan M Dastin-van Rijn; Nicole R Provenza; Gregory S Vogt; Michelle Avendano-Ortega; Sameer A Sheth; Wayne K Goodman; Matthew T Harrison; David A Borton Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.473
Authors: Ezra E Smith; Ki Sueng Choi; Ashan Veerakumar; Mosadoluwa Obatusin; Bryan Howell; Andrew H Smith; Vineet Tiruvadi; Andrea L Crowell; Patricio Riva-Posse; Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Christopher J Rozell; Helen S Mayberg; Allison C Waters Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 3.473