Literature DB >> 20362474

Geographic origin of publications in radiological journals as a function of GDP and percentage of GDP spent on research.

Darragh Halpenny1, John Burke, Graeme McNeill, Aisling Snow, William C Torreggiani.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the geographic origin of publications in the highest impacting radiology journals and to examine the link between the percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) spent on research by a country and the output of radiology publications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The five highest impacting general radiology journals (according to the ISI Web of Knowledge database) were selected over a 6-year period from January 2002 to December 2007. Publications were totaled according to the country of the corresponding author. Publications (total and corrected for population size) were assessed according to the GDP of a given country and the percentage of GDP spent on research in that country. Correlation was determined using Spearman's rank.
RESULTS: In total, 10,925 papers were identified. The top 10 nations produced 83.9% of the total number of papers. The United States was the most prolific country, with 41.7% of the total. The second-ranked and third-ranked countries were Germany (11.6%) and Japan (6.7%). Corrected for GDP, smaller European countries outperformed larger nations. Switzerland (0.925 publications per billion of GDP), Austria (0.694 publications per billion of GDP), and Belgium (0.648 publications per billion of GDP) produced the most papers per billion of GDP. When corrected for percentage of GDP spent on research, European countries again ranked highest, with Greece, Turkey, and Belgium having the best ratios. The percentage of GDP spent on research was positively correlated with the number of publications in high-ranking radiology journals (r = 0.603, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The United States is the most productive country in absolute number of publications. The flaws of using population size to compare publication output are clear, and a comparison using GDP and the percentage of GDP spent on research may give more meaningful results. When GDP is taken into consideration, smaller European countries are more productive. The importance of investment in radiologic research is emphasized by the association between increased funding of research and the number of publications in high-impacting radiology journals. Copyright (c) 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362474     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

1.  Colonial history and global economics distort our understanding of deep-time biodiversity.

Authors:  Nussaïbah B Raja; Emma M Dunne; Aviwe Matiwane; Tasnuva Ming Khan; Paulina S Nätscher; Aline M Ghilardi; Devapriya Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Impact of GDP, spending on R&D, number of universities and scientific journals on research publications among Asian countries.

Authors:  Sultan Ayoub Meo; Abeer A Al Masri; Adnan Mahmood Usmani; Almas Naeem Memon; Syed Ziauddin Zaidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Worldwide inequality in production of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Arsia Jamali; Saharnaz Nedjat; Kazem Heidari; Raika Jamali; Kiana Hassanpour; Sima Nedjat; Pasha Anvari; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-12-27

4.  Impact factor of medical education journals and recently developed indices: Can any of them support academic promotion criteria?

Authors:  S A Azer; A Holen; I Wilson; N Skokauskas
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.476

5.  Worldwide orthopaedic research activity 2010-2014: Publication rates in the top 15 orthopaedic journals related to population size and gross domestic product.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Vaida Glatt; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-18

6.  Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research.

Authors:  Bakur A Jamjoom; Abdulhakim B Jamjoom
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2016-03-12

7.  Fecal microbiota transplantation research output from 2004 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Yan Li; Ziyuan Zou; Xiaohui Bian; Yushan Huang; Yanru Wang; Chen Yang; Jian Zhao; Lang Xie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  The hundred most frequently cited studies on sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Tomasz Stefura; Artur Kacprzyk; Jakub Droś; Katarzyna Chłopaś; Michał Wysocki; Anna Rzepa; Magdalena Pisarska; Piotr Małczak; Michał Pędziwiatr; Michał Nowakowski; Andrzej Budzyński; Piotr Major
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Orthopaedic Academic Activity in the United States: Bibliometric Analysis of Publications by City and State.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Vaida Glatt; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2018-07-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.