Literature DB >> 20362386

Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial.

Neil Joshi1, Willem de Blok, Erik van Muilekom, Henk van der Poel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients develop urinary incontinence early after radical prostatectomy. Posterior reconstruction of supporting tissues has been found to reduce incontinence in open and conventional laparoscopic prostatectomy series.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether our version of a posterior musculofascial reconstruction will reduce early incontinence and have a beneficial effect on patients' quality of life (QoL). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven consecutive patients undergoing primary robot-assisted radical laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a single surgeon at one tertiary referral oncology institution were alternately assigned (not randomised) to intervention (n=53) or control groups (n=54). SURGICAL PROCEDURE: RALP with median fibrous raphe reconstruction (MFRR) followed by formation of the urethrovesical anastomosis (intervention group) versus standard anastomosis without posterior reconstruction (control group). MEASUREMENTS: Measurements included incontinence at baseline and 3-mo intervals; QoL as measured by a simple questionnaire, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), and Prostate Cancer Module (PR25) questionnaires preoperatively and at 6 mo postprocedure; tumour characteristics; operative time; fascial preservation score; duration of catheterisation; and anastomotic leakage on cystogram. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: For intervention and control groups respectively, mean catheter duration was 11.74 d and 12.74 d (p=0.451); leakage on cystogram was present in six and eight cases (p=0.28); and incontinence (any involuntary urine loss) at 3 mo was 75% and 69% (p=0.391) and at 6 mo was 51% and 43% (p=0.686). Urinary retention occurred only in one case (control group). The percentage of cases returning to baseline in all QoL domains (except insomnia) was similar at 6 mo between the two groups. Short follow-up, lack of blinding, and probable small differences in our method of MFRR performed compared with other studies were identified as significant limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in any of the analysed outcome measures was observed. Posterior reconstruction of the musculofascial complex does not appear to improve early urinary incontinence after RALP. Copyright 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362386     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  18 in total

1.  Laparoscopic "single knot-single running" suture vesico-urethral anastomosis with posterior musculofascial reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Rocco Papalia; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Salvatore Guaglianone; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Vas deferens urethral support improves early post-prostatectomy urine continence.

Authors:  H G van der Poel; W De Blok; H A M Van Muilekom
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-09

4.  Predictors of short-term recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jüri R Palisaar; Florian Roghmann; Marko Brock; Björn Löppenberg; Joachim Noldus; Christian von Bodman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kadono; Takahiro Nohara; Shohei Kawaguchi; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  [Stress incontinence after prostatectomy in treatment reality: results from a rehabilitation clinic].

Authors:  V Lent; H M Schultheis; L Strauß; M K Laaser; S Buntrock
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Impact of a retrotrigonal layer backup stitch on post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Mun Su Chung; Seung Hwan Lee; Ha Bum Jung; Won Kyu Park; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19

8.  Posterior reconstruction and outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a high-risk setting.

Authors:  U Anceschi; M Gaffi; C Molinari; C Anceschi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Robot-assisted urological surgery: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Wooju Jeong; Ali Dabaja; Mani Menon
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-02-09

10.  Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Masashi Matsushima; Akira Miyajima; Seiya Hattori; Toshikazu Takeda; Ryuichi Mizuno; Eiji Kikuchi; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.