Literature DB >> 20362250

Testing minimal clinically important difference: additional comments and scientific reality testing.

Robert J Gatchel1, Tom G Mayer.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20362250      PMCID： PMC2872626          DOI： 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN： 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Nathaniel P Katz; Robert D Kerns; Gerold Stucki; Robert R Allen; Nicholas Bellamy; Daniel B Carr; Julie Chandler; Penney Cowan; Raymond Dionne; Bradley S Galer; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Cynthia G McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Wendye Robbins; James P Robinson; Margaret Rothman; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Wendy Stein; Jane Tollett; Joachim Wernicke; James Witter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Understanding inconsistencies in patient-reported outcomes after spine treatment: response shift phenomena.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.166
  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  David A T Werner; Margreth Grotle; Sasha Gulati; Ivar M Austevoll; Greger Lønne; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Comparing effects of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and non-surgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Frank M Phillips; Jan Van Meirhaeghe; James R Berenson; Gunnar B J Andersson; Gary Chung; Brent J Small; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Feasibility and Validity of Asking Patients to Define Individual Levels of Meaningful Change on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Salene M W Jones; Yuxian Du; Ari Bell-Brown; Kaylin Bolt; Joseph M Unger
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2020-07-27

4.  What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success.

Authors:  Mirad Taso; Jon Håvard Sommernes; Siri Bjorland; John Anker Zwart; Kaia Beck Engebretsen; Jarle Sundseth; Are Hugo Pripp; Frode Kolstad; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients.

Authors:  Ioannis Papanastassiou; Roberta Anderson; Nicole Barber; Cathleen Conover; Antonio E Castellvi
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-12-01

6.  Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?

Authors:  David A T Werner; Margreth Grotle; Sasha Gulati; Ivar M Austevoll; Mattis A Madsbu; Greger Lønne; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-06-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.