Literature DB >> 20362246

Health-related quality of life: a comparison of outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with large joint replacement surgery and population norms.

Sabarul A Mokhtar1, Peter F McCombe, Owen D Williamson, Michael K Morgan, Gavin J White, William R Sears.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Degenerative spine disease will become an increasing health problem, and a significant number of patients will be considered for surgery. Spinal surgeries have evolved since the last decades, and there is a positive impact on the clinical outcomes. Few works in the literature have reviewed the outcome compared with large joint replacement surgery, which is considered a benchmark for operative restoration of patients' quality of life.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate if spinal fusion can return patients' health-related quality of life to that of age-matched population norms and yield outcomes comparable with those of total hip and knee joint replacement. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample consists of 100 consecutive patients who were enrolled between December 1997 and January 2007. OUTCOME MEASURES: The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) was chosen for outcome measurement.
METHODS: All patients underwent wide decompressive laminectomy and single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative physical component summary (PCS)-12 scores of the spinal fusion patients were comparable with those of both the total knee and hip replacement patients. The mean improvement in PCS-12 scores after spine surgery was 11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-14, p<.0001). It was equal to that after total hip replacement surgery, which was 11 (95% CI: 9-13), and higher than that of total knee replacement patients, which had an improvement of 8 (95% CI: 7-9). The postoperative mean and 95% CI of the PCS-12 scores for the three surgical procedures approached the population norm value of 44 (95% CI: 43-46).There was no statistical difference between the postoperative mental component summary-12 score among all the three surgical groups, which approached similar to the population norm value of 54 (95% CI: 53-54).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that spinal surgery can return patients' HRQL to that of age-matched population norms and yield outcomes comparable with those of total hip and knee joint replacement patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362246     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  7 in total

1.  Does the wait for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis surgery have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Christopher S Bailey; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; David Taylor; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; Corinne Tallon; Yves Bureau; Jennifer C Urquhart
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  EUROSPINE 2017 FULL PAPER AWARD: Time to remove our rose-tinted spectacles: a candid appraisal of the relative success of surgery in over 4500 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, hip or knee.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig; Dezsö Jeszenszy; Hans-Jürgen Becker; Daniel Haschtmann; Stefan Preiss; Tamas F Fekete
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Factors affecting health-related quality of life one year after lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Kazufumi Miyagishima; Eiki Tsushima; Kazuhiro Ishida; Shigenobu Sato
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Karl-Åke Jansson; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Disability, Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality in Lumbar Spine Fusion Patients-A 5-Year Follow-Up and Comparison With a Population Sample.

Authors:  Leevi Toivonen; Liisa Pekkanen; Marko H Neva; Hannu Kautiainen; Kati Kyrölä; Ilkka Marttinen; Arja Häkkinen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 6.  A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Benny Borgman; Simona Vertuani; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Disability and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing spinal fusion: a comparison with a general population sample.

Authors:  Liisa Pekkanen; Marko H Neva; Hannu Kautiainen; Joost Dekker; Kirsi Piitulainen; Marko Wahlman; Arja Häkkinen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.