Literature DB >> 2036219

Reproducibility of histopathological evaluation in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Clinical implications.

B Lund1, H K Thomsen, J Olsen.   

Abstract

An interobserver analysis of the reproducibility of malignancy grade and of histological type classified according to World Health Organization criteria was performed in 261 ovarian tumours, stages IIB to IV. All available slides per patient including metastatic tumours (16%) were reviewed independently by two pathologists. Overall observed agreement regarding type was 68%. The chance-corrected agreement expressed by the kappa coefficient was 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.49-0.61). Overall observed agreement regarding grade was 41% compared with a kappa coefficient of 0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.26). Kappa coefficients, ranging from 0.18 to -1.00 for associations between type categories and from 0.20 to -0.32 for grade categories, indicated that any suggested pattern of association could be caused by chance occurrences. A more objective approach to histopathology is needed in ovarian carcinoma before its prognostic impact can be assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036219     DOI: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1991.tb05161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

1.  Histotype classification of ovarian carcinoma: A comparison of approaches.

Authors:  Lauren C Peres; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Michael Anglesio; Kristine Wicklund; Rex Bentley; Andrew Berchuck; Linda E Kelemen; Tayyebeh M Nazeran; C Blake Gilks; Holly R Harris; David G Huntsman; Joellen M Schildkraut; Mary Anne Rossing; Martin Köbel; Jennifer A Doherty
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Histological grading in a large series of advanced stage ovarian carcinomas by three widely used grading systems: consistent lack of prognostic significance. A translational research subprotocol of a prospective randomized phase III study (AGO-OVAR 3 protocol).

Authors:  Stefan Kommoss; Dietmar Schmidt; Friedrich Kommoss; Juergen Hedderich; Philipp Harter; Jacobus Pfisterer; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  [Ovarian carcinoma. Do the subtypes reflect different diseases?].

Authors:  M Köbel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Tumors that mimic asbestos-related mesothelioma: time to consider a genetics-based tumor registry?

Authors:  Brent D Kerger; Robert C James; David A Galbraith
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Ovarian cancer: diagnostic accuracy and tumor types distribution in East Africa compared to North America.

Authors:  Peter F Rambau; Martin Köbel; Derek Tilley; Alex Mremi; Robert Lukande; William Muller
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Immunohistochemical Characterization Improves the Reproducibility of the Histological Diagnosis of Ovarian Carcinoma

Authors:  Nabiha Missaoui; Said Salhi; Ahlem Bdioui; Sarra Mestiri; Nihed Abdessayed; Moncef Mokni; Mohamed Tahar Yacoubi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-09-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.