Literature DB >> 20361860

Online learning versus simulation for teaching principles of mechanical ventilation to nurse practitioner students.

Susan J Corbridge1, F Patrick Robinson, Jennifer Tiffen, Thomas C Corbridge.   

Abstract

Patient simulation is increasingly used in the education of healthcare providers, yet few studies have compared simulation to other teaching modalities. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction between two methods of teaching the principles of mechanical ventilation to advanced practice nursing (APN) students: high-fidelity patient simulation (including face-to-face instruction) versus an online, narrated PowerPoint presentation. Twenty APN students were randomized to either the simulation or online teaching method in this pre/posttest study. Measures included a 12-item knowledge questionnaire and a 5-item satisfaction survey. Both groups had significant improvement in knowledge scores from pretest to posttest, but knowledge scores were not significantly different at posttest between groups. Student satisfaction with their learning method was significantly higher in the simulation group. Students choosing to participate in the alternative teaching method after study completion preferred the simulation to the online method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20361860     DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh        ISSN: 1548-923X


  8 in total

1.  Observed improvements in an intern's ability to initiate critical emergency skills in different cardiac arrest scenarios using high-fidelity simulation.

Authors:  David J Starmer; Sean A Duquette; Dominic Guiliano; Anthony Tibbles; Andrew Miners; Kevin Finn; Brynne E Stainsby
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-05-16

2.  Development and implementation of a novel, mandatory competency-based medical education simulation program for pediatric emergency medicine faculty.

Authors:  Jonathan Pirie; Jabeen Fayyaz; Mireille Gharib; Laura Simone; Carrie Glanfield; Anna Kempinska
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Simulation Training for Residents Focused on Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Trial Using Mannequin-Based Versus Computer-Based Simulation.

Authors:  Savino Spadaro; Dan Stieper Karbing; Alberto Fogagnolo; Riccardo Ragazzi; Francesco Mojoli; Luca Astolfi; Antonio Gioia; Elisabetta Marangoni; Stephen Edward Rees; Carlo Alberto Volta
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carmen La Cerra; Angelo Dante; Valeria Caponnetto; Ilaria Franconi; Elona Gaxhja; Cristina Petrucci; Celeste M Alfes; Loreto Lancia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Learning outcomes of a flipped classroom teaching approach in an adult-health nursing course: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Fan; Ying-Jung Tseng; Li-Fen Chao; Shiah-Lian Chen; Sui-Whi Jane
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Simulations for mechanical ventilation in children: review and future prospects.

Authors:  Olivier Flechelles; Annie Ho; Patrice Hernert; Guillaume Emeriaud; Nesrine Zaglam; Farida Cheriet; Philippe A Jouvet
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-07

7.  The Physiotherapy eSkills Training Online resource improves performance of practical skills: a controlled trial.

Authors:  Elisabeth Preston; Louise Ada; Catherine M Dean; Rosalyn Stanton; Gordon Waddington; Colleen Canning
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 8.  An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals.

Authors:  Sharon Lawn; Xiaojuan Zhi; Andrea Morello
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.