PURPOSE: The mean length of children's utterances is a valuable estimate of their early language acquisition. The available normative data lack documentation of language and nonverbal intelligence levels of the samples. This study reports age-referenced mean length of utterance (MLU) data from children with specific language impairment (SLI) and children without language impairments. METHOD: Of the 306 child participants drawn from a data archive, ages 2;6-9;0 (years;months), 170 were in the SLI group and 136 were in the control group. There were 1,564 spontaneous language samples collected, and these were transcribed and analyzed for sample size and MLU in words and morphemes. Means, standard deviations, and effect sizes for group differences are reported for MLUs, along with concurrent language and nonverbal intelligence assessments, per 6-month intervals. RESULTS: The results document an age progression in MLU words and morphemes and a persistent lower level of performance for children with SLI. CONCLUSION: The results support the reliability and validity of MLU as an index of normative language acquisition and a marker of language impairment. The findings can be used for clinical benchmarking of deficits and language intervention outcomes as well as for comparisons across research samples.
PURPOSE: The mean length of children's utterances is a valuable estimate of their early language acquisition. The available normative data lack documentation of language and nonverbal intelligence levels of the samples. This study reports age-referenced mean length of utterance (MLU) data from children with specific language impairment (SLI) and children without language impairments. METHOD: Of the 306 childparticipants drawn from a data archive, ages 2;6-9;0 (years;months), 170 were in the SLI group and 136 were in the control group. There were 1,564 spontaneous language samples collected, and these were transcribed and analyzed for sample size and MLU in words and morphemes. Means, standard deviations, and effect sizes for group differences are reported for MLUs, along with concurrent language and nonverbal intelligence assessments, per 6-month intervals. RESULTS: The results document an age progression in MLU words and morphemes and a persistent lower level of performance for children with SLI. CONCLUSION: The results support the reliability and validity of MLU as an index of normative language acquisition and a marker of language impairment. The findings can be used for clinical benchmarking of deficits and language intervention outcomes as well as for comparisons across research samples.
Authors: C A Dollaghan; T F Campbell; J L Paradise; H M Feldman; J E Janosky; D N Pitcairn; M Kurs-Lasky Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: M Falcaro; A Pickles; D F Newbury; L Addis; E Banfield; S E Fisher; A P Monaco; Z Simkin; G Conti-Ramsden Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Lisa M Bedore; Elizabeth D Peña; Jissel B Anaya; Ricardo Nieto; Mirza J Lugo-Neris; Alisa Baron Journal: Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mabel L Rice; Catherine L Taylor; Stephen R Zubrick; Lesa Hoffman; Kathleen K Earnest Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 2.297