Literature DB >> 2035912

A model for compound action potentials and currents in a nerve bundle. III: A comparison of the conduction velocity distributions calculated from compound action currents and potentials.

R S Wijesinghe1, F L Gielen, J P Wikswo.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present the experimentally measured Compound Action Current (CACs) and Compound Action Potentials (CAPs) from frog sciatic nerves and earthworm nerve cords. We used histologically prepared cross sections of these nerve bundles to determine the distribution of fiber diameters. A modified volume conduction model that includes frequency-dependent conductivities was used to compute the Single Fiber Action Signals (SFASs). The recorded CACs and CAPs are used to predict the Conduction Velocity Distributions (CVDs) from the nerve bundles. The predicted CVDs are then compared with the histological CVDs. Analysis of Compound Action Signals from the three giant axons in the earthworm nerve cord and microelectrode data for the transmembrane action potential demonstrate the validity of our mathematical model. We found that the CVDs predicted from the recorded CACs and CAPs differ from the histological CVD for a variety of reasons. The validity of the assumption of a linear relationship between axon diameter and conduction velocity of a propagating action signal was investigated using CVDs from both the CAC and CAP. Variations of the CVDs with the propagation distance of the CASs and the recording temperature were investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2035912     DOI: 10.1007/bf02368462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  17 in total

1.  A model for compound action potentials and currents in a nerve bundle. II: A sensitivity analysis of model parameters for the forward and inverse calculations.

Authors:  R S Wijesinghe; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A model for compound action potentials and currents in a nerve bundle. I: The forward calculation.

Authors:  R S Wijesinghe; F L Gielen; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Conduction velocity and spike configuration in myelinated fibres: computed dependence on internode distance.

Authors:  M H Brill; S G Waxman; J W Moore; R W Joyner
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Conduction velocity in myelinated nerve fibres of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  N A Hutchinson; Z J Koles; R S Smith
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Modelling compound action potentials of peripheral nerves in situ. I. Model description: evidence for a non-linear relation between fibre diameter and velocity.

Authors:  D F Stegeman; J P De Weerd
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-10

6.  The magnetic field of a single axon. A comparison of theory and experiment.

Authors:  B J Roth; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A low-noise low input impedance amplifier for magnetic measurements of nerve action currents.

Authors:  J P Wikswo; P C Samson; R P Giffard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Temperature dependence of normal sensory nerve action potentials.

Authors:  H P Ludin; F Beyeler
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1977-10-07       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Single myelinated peripheral nerve fibers -- anatomic and electrophysiologic studies relevant to conduction velocity and fiber diameter histogram prediction from surface recorded potentials.

Authors:  S L BeMent
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1981

10.  Quantitative anatomical measurements on single isolated fibres from the cat spinal cord.

Authors:  W I McDonald; G D Ohlrich
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  7 in total

1.  A model for compound action potentials and currents in a nerve bundle. I: The forward calculation.

Authors:  R S Wijesinghe; F L Gielen; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Is it possible to detect dendrite currents using presently available magnetic resonance imaging techniques?

Authors:  William I Jay; Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Brain D Dolasinski; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Computational modelling of nerve stimulation and recording with peripheral visceral neural interfaces.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Sophie C Payne; Natalia P Biscola; Leif A Havton; Janet R Keast; Peregrine B Osborne; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Detection of peripheral nerve and skeletal muscle action currents using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Non-invasive detection of animal nerve impulses with an atomic magnetometer operating near quantum limited sensitivity.

Authors:  Kasper Jensen; Rima Budvytyte; Rodrigo A Thomas; Tian Wang; Annette M Fuchs; Mikhail V Balabas; Georgios Vasilakis; Lars D Mosgaard; Hans C Stærkind; Jörg H Müller; Thomas Heimburg; Søren-Peter Olesen; Eugene S Polzik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Selective inhibition of small-diameter axons using infrared light.

Authors:  Emilie H Lothet; Kendrick M Shaw; Hui Lu; Junqi Zhuo; Yves T Wang; Shi Gu; Donna B Stolz; E Duco Jansen; Charles C Horn; Hillel J Chiel; Michael W Jenkins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of dexmedetomidine and dexketoprofen on the conduction block of rat sciatic nerve.

Authors:  Sengal Bagci Taylan; Hulagu Bariskaner
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.135

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.