| Literature DB >> 20358444 |
Zhaoling Meng1, Hui Quan, Li Fan, Robert Kringle, Gordon Sun.
Abstract
Using historical studies, we compared the impact of using the average baseline or time-matched baseline on diurnal effect correction, treatment effect estimation, and analysis of variance/covariance (ANOVA/ANCOVA) efficiency in a parallel thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study. Under a multivariate normal distribution assumption, we derived conditions for achieving unbiasness and better efficiency when using the average baseline, and confirmed these conditions using historical TQT studies. Furthermore, simulations were conducted under the randomized trial with and without observed imbalanced baseline settings. We conclude that the analyses using average baseline yield better efficiency and unbiased or less biased results under our TQT study conditions.Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20358444 DOI: 10.1080/10543400903582067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biopharm Stat ISSN: 1054-3406 Impact factor: 1.051