BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff repair is a commonly performed procedure, but many of these repairs fail in the postoperative term. Despite advances in surgical methods to optimize the repair, failure rates still persist clinically, thereby suggesting the need for novel mechanical or biological augmentation strategies. Nonresorbable implants provide an appealing approach because patch materials may confer acute mechanical stability and act as a conductive scaffold for tissue ingrowth at the site of the tendon insertion. HYPOTHESIS: The polyurethane scaffold mesh will confer greater biomechanical function relative to a nonaugmented repair after 12 weeks in vivo using a chronic ovine model of rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: After development of the chronic rupture model, the tensile failure properties of the nonresorbable mesh-augmented repair (n, 9) were compared with those of a surgical control in an ovine model (n, 8). RESULTS: Rotator cuff repair with the scaffold mesh in the chronic model resulted in a significant 74.2% increase in force at failure relative to the nonaugmented surgical control (P = .021). Apparent increases in stiffness (55.4%) and global displacement at failure (21.4%) in the mesh-augmented group relative to nonaugmented controls were not significant (P = .126 and P = .123, respectively). At the study endpoint, the augmented shoulders recovered 37.8% and 40.7% of the force at failure and stiffness, respectively, of intact, nonoperated controls. CONCLUSION: Using the previously described chronic rupture model, this study demonstrated that repair of a chronic tendon tear with the polyurethane scaffold mesh provides greater mechanical strength in the critical healing period than that of traditional suture anchor repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This device could be used to enhance the surgical repair of the rotator cuff and consequently improve long-term clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff repair is a commonly performed procedure, but many of these repairs fail in the postoperative term. Despite advances in surgical methods to optimize the repair, failure rates still persist clinically, thereby suggesting the need for novel mechanical or biological augmentation strategies. Nonresorbable implants provide an appealing approach because patch materials may confer acute mechanical stability and act as a conductive scaffold for tissue ingrowth at the site of the tendon insertion. HYPOTHESIS: The polyurethane scaffold mesh will confer greater biomechanical function relative to a nonaugmented repair after 12 weeks in vivo using a chronic ovine model of rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: After development of the chronic rupture model, the tensile failure properties of the nonresorbable mesh-augmented repair (n, 9) were compared with those of a surgical control in an ovine model (n, 8). RESULTS: Rotator cuff repair with the scaffold mesh in the chronic model resulted in a significant 74.2% increase in force at failure relative to the nonaugmented surgical control (P = .021). Apparent increases in stiffness (55.4%) and global displacement at failure (21.4%) in the mesh-augmented group relative to nonaugmented controls were not significant (P = .126 and P = .123, respectively). At the study endpoint, the augmented shoulders recovered 37.8% and 40.7% of the force at failure and stiffness, respectively, of intact, nonoperated controls. CONCLUSION: Using the previously described chronic rupture model, this study demonstrated that repair of a chronic tendon tear with the polyurethane scaffold mesh provides greater mechanical strength in the critical healing period than that of traditional suture anchor repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This device could be used to enhance the surgical repair of the rotator cuff and consequently improve long-term clinical outcome.
Authors: Eli T Sayegh; John D Sandy; Mandeep S Virk; Anthony A Romeo; Robert W Wysocki; Jorge O Galante; Katie J Trella; Anna Plaas; Vincent M Wang Journal: Curr Tissue Eng Date: 2015
Authors: Benjamin B Rothrauff; Thierry Pauyo; Richard E Debski; Mark W Rodosky; Rocky S Tuan; Volker Musahl Journal: Tissue Eng Part B Rev Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 6.389
Authors: Sandeep Mannava; Johannes F Plate; Christopher J Tuohy; Thorsten M Seyler; Patrick W Whitlock; Walton W Curl; Thomas L Smith; Katherine R Saul Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-07-29 Impact factor: 4.342