Literature DB >> 20357335

The radiological evaluation of acetabular fractures in the elderly.

A N Miller1, M L Prasarn, D G Lorich, D L Helfet.   

Abstract

We have examined the accuracy of reduction and the functional outcomes in elderly patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures, based on assessment of plain radiographs and CT scans. There were 45 patients with such a fracture with a mean age of 67 years (59 to 82) at the time of surgery. All patients completed SF-36 questionnaires to determine the functional outcome at a mean follow-up of 72.4 months (24 to 188). All had radiographs and a CT scan within one week of surgery. The reduction was categorised as 'anatomical', 'imperfect', or 'poor'. Radiographs classified 26 patients (58%) as anatomical,13 (29%) as imperfect and six (13%) as poor. The maximum displacement on CT showed none as anatomical, 23 (51%) as imperfect and 22 (49%) as poor, but this was not always at the weight-bearing dome. SF-36 scores showed functional outcomes comparable with those of the general elderly population, with no correlation with the radiological reduction. Perfect anatomical reduction is not necessary to attain a good functional outcome in acetabular fractures in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20357335     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.23494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  9 in total

1.  [Surgical treatment of acetabulum fractures in the elderly. Osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis].

Authors:  C Fölsch; M M Alwani; V Jurow; R Stiletto
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Quality of life from return to work and sports activities to sexual dysfunction after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Andrea Stefano Monteleone; Pietro Feltri; Mauro Natale Molina; Jochen Müller; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Fragility Fractures of the Acetabulum: Current Concepts for Improving Patients' Outcomes.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toro; Adriano Braile; Annalisa De Cicco; Raffaele Pezzella; Francesco Ascione; Antonio Benedetto Cecere; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Eelco Bronsema; Martijn A J te Stroet; Maartje Zengerink; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Management of high-energy acetabular fractures in the elderly individuals: a current review.

Authors:  Brian W Hill; Julie A Switzer; Peter A Cole
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

6.  The influence of bone quality on radiological outcome in 50 consecutive acetabular fractures treated with a pre-contoured anatomic suprapectineal plate.

Authors:  Maximilian J Hartel; Tareq Naji; Florian Fensky; Frank O Henes; Darius M Thiesen; Wolfgang Lehmann; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Dimitris Ntalos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  A novel fixation system for acetabular quadrilateral plate fracture: a comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Guo-Chun Zha; Jun-Ying Sun; Sheng-Jie Dong; Wen Zhang; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Anatomical quadrilateral plate for acetabulum fractures involving quadrilateral surface: A review.

Authors:  Ramesh K Sen; Gaurav Saini; Sagar Kadam; Neha Raman
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

Review 9.  Acetabular fractures in the elderly: modern challenges and the role of conservative management.

Authors:  Kunal Mohan; James M Broderick; Hasnain Raza; Brendan O'Daly; Michael Leonard
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.089

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.