Literature DB >> 20357325

Wear-pattern analysis in retrieved tibial inserts of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prostheses.

Y-C Lu1, C-H Huang, T-K Chang, F-Y Ho, C-K Cheng, C-H Huang.   

Abstract

Components from 73 failed knee replacements (TKRs) consisting of rotating-platform, mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing implants were examined to assess the patterns of wear. The patterns were divided into low-grade (burnishing, abrasion and cold flow) and high-grade (scratching, pitting/metal embedding and delamination) to assess the severity of the wear of polyethylene. The rotating-platform group had a higher incidence of low-grade wear on the upper surface compared with the fixed-bearing group. By contrast, high-grade wear comprising scratching, pitting and third-body embedding was seen on the lower surface. Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation of the wear scores between the upper and lower surfaces of the tibial insert (R(2) = 0.29, p = 0.04) for the rotating-platform group, but no significant correlation was found for the fixed-bearing counterpart. This suggests that high-grade wear patterns on the upper surface are reduced with the rotating-platform design. However, the incidence of burnishing, pitting/third-body embedding and scratching wear patterns on the lower surface was higher compared with that in the fixed-bearing knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20357325     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; John P Collier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The 2012 Mark Coventry award: a retrieval analysis of high flexion versus posterior-stabilized tibial inserts.

Authors:  Nicholas R Paterson; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Wear damage in mobile-bearing TKA is as severe as that in fixed-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Natalie H Kelly; Rose H Fu; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Rotaglide+ total knee replacement: a comparison of mobile versus fixed bearings.

Authors:  Lorcan McGonagle; Louisa Bethell; Natalie Byrne; Ben G Bolton-Maggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Rebecca L Zimmerman; Robert H Hopper; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does increased topside conformity in modular total knee arthroplasty lead to increased backside wear?

Authors:  Ran Schwarzkopf; Richard D Scott; Evan M Carlson; John H Currier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  In vivo kinematics of high-flex mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty, with a new post-cam design, in deep knee bending motion.

Authors:  Masahiro Kurita; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Masakazu Fujii; Kazuma Futai; Norimasa Shimizu; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.