BACKGROUND: There is a long history of research into the attributes of carers of people with psychosis, but few interventions target their distress or their difficulties. AIMS: To describe an empirically based model of the relationships of those caring for people with psychosis to inform clinical and theoretical advances. METHOD: We developed a model of informal carer relationships in psychosis, based on an integration of the literature elaborating the concept of expressed emotion. The model accounts for divergent outcomes of three relationship types: positive, overinvolved and critical/hostile relationships. RESULTS: Good evidence supports a number of hypotheses concerning the origin and maintenance of these relationship outcomes, which relate to specific differences in carer attributions, illness perceptions, coping behaviour, social support, distress, depression and low self-esteem predicted by our model. We propose that interventions aimed at modifying the specific maintenance factors involved in the different styles of relationships will optimise therapeutic change both for service users with psychosis and for their carers. CONCLUSIONS: Family work in psychosis, which improves relationships through problem-solving, reduces service user relapse. It is now time to consider theory-based interventions focused on improving carer outcomes.
BACKGROUND: There is a long history of research into the attributes of carers of people with psychosis, but few interventions target their distress or their difficulties. AIMS: To describe an empirically based model of the relationships of those caring for people with psychosis to inform clinical and theoretical advances. METHOD: We developed a model of informal carer relationships in psychosis, based on an integration of the literature elaborating the concept of expressed emotion. The model accounts for divergent outcomes of three relationship types: positive, overinvolved and critical/hostile relationships. RESULTS: Good evidence supports a number of hypotheses concerning the origin and maintenance of these relationship outcomes, which relate to specific differences in carer attributions, illness perceptions, coping behaviour, social support, distress, depression and low self-esteem predicted by our model. We propose that interventions aimed at modifying the specific maintenance factors involved in the different styles of relationships will optimise therapeutic change both for service users with psychosis and for their carers. CONCLUSIONS: Family work in psychosis, which improves relationships through problem-solving, reduces service user relapse. It is now time to consider theory-based interventions focused on improving carer outcomes.
Authors: Preethi Premkumar; Ulrich Ettinger; Sophie Inchley-Mort; Alexander Sumich; Steven C R Williams; Elizabeth Kuipers; Veena Kumari Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Terence V McCann; Dan I Lubman; Sue M Cotton; Brendan Murphy; Kingsley Crisp; Lisa Catania; Claudia Marck; John F M Gleeson Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar; Mar Rus-Calafell; Thomas K J Craig; Matias Irarrazaval; Alfonso Urzúa; Laurent Boyer; David R Williams Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Klaus Hesse; Levente Kriston; Stephanie Mehl; Andreas Wittorf; Wolfgang Wiedemann; Wolfgang Wölwer; Stefan Klingberg Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Katerina Koutra; Sofia Triliva; Theano Roumeliotaki; Maria Basta; Christos Lionis; Alexandros N Vgontzas Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2015-08-19