Literature DB >> 20356944

Randomized controlled trial of mammographic screening from age 40 ('Age' trial): patterns of screening attendance.

L E Johns1, S M Moss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Age trial was a randomized controlled trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of invitation to annual mammography from age 40 to 41. Uptake of invitation to screening mammography in UK women aged below 50 is of interest, particularly in the light of the recent announcement that the national breast screening programme will begin inviting women from age 47.
METHODS: The trial took place in 23 National Health Service breast screening units in England, Wales and Scotland between 1991 and 2004. Data on invitation and attendance during 13 years of trial fieldwork were analysed. The participants were 53,884 women in the intervention arm of the Age trial who were randomized to receive annual invitation to mammography from age 40 or 41 up to age 48. The trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN24647151.
RESULTS: Uptake of invitation to routine screening was 68% at first round and 69% at subsequent rounds. A total of 43,709 women in the intervention arm (81%) attended at least one routine screen and 23,262 (43%) attended at least seven screens; 31,392 women attended 75% or more of all routine invitations they were offered. Previous trial attendance was a predictor of subsequent uptake; attendance was inversely related to Townsend deprivation score.
CONCLUSION: Uptake in this trial was comparable with that in the UK screening programme for women aged over 50. There was an inverse relationship between deprivation level and the number of screens attended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20356944     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2010.009091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  8 in total

1.  False-positive results in the randomized controlled trial of mammographic screening from age 40 ("Age" trial).

Authors:  Louise E Johns; Sue M Moss
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Predictions to Observed Clinical Trial Results of Mammography Screening from Ages 40 to 49.

Authors:  Jeroen J van den Broek; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Elizabeth S Burnside; Cong Xu; Yisheng Li; Oguzhan Alagoz; Sandra J Lee; Natasha K Stout; Juhee Song; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Sylvia K Plevritis; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Extracellular NM23 Signaling in Breast Cancer: Incommodus Verum.

Authors:  Iain L O Buxton; Nucharee Yokdang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Characteristics of men responding to an invitation to undergo testing for prostate cancer as part of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Eleanor I Walsh; Emma L Turner; J Athene Lane; Jenny L Donovan; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The current and potential health benefits of the National Health Service Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme in England: A microsimulation study.

Authors:  Oliver T Mytton; Christopher Jackson; Arno Steinacher; Anna Goodman; Claudia Langenberg; Simon Griffin; Nick Wareham; James Woodcock
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

8.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Daniel Vulkan; Howard Cuckle; Dharmishta Parmar; Shama Sheikh; Robert A Smith; Andrew Evans; Oleg Blyuss; Louise Johns; Ian O Ellis; Jonathan Myles; Peter D Sasieni; Sue M Moss
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 41.316

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.