Literature DB >> 20356856

Estimating screening test sensitivity and tumour progression using tumour size and time since previous screening.

Harald Weedon-Fekjaer1, Steinar Tretli, Odd O Aalen.   

Abstract

As mammography screening aims to improve the prognosis through earlier detection/treatment, tumour progression and screening test sensitivity (STS) represent key parameters in the evaluation of screening programs. We will here study some methods for estimation of tumour progression and STS, and show how previously used methods can be combined and developed to utilise more of the data available in modern screening programs. Weedon-Fekjaer et al. recently suggested a study design using interview data about time since previous screening to estimate tumour progression and STS in a stepwise Markov model. While useful, the approach does not utilise tumour size measurements, nor link tumour progression to tumour size. Hence, we will here propose formulas for estimating tumour progression and STS using a continuous tumour growth model. To estimate tumour progression and STS, tumour growth curves are followed from one screening to the next, and probabilities for all combinations of tumour sizes at repeated screening examinations calculated. Based on the probabilities for screening detection on subsequent screening examinations, maximum likelihood estimates are calculated. Applied to Norwegian data, the new approach gives similar results to previously published results based on interval data, confirming the earlier estimated large variation in tumour growth rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20356856     DOI: 10.1177/0962280209359860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  5 in total

1.  Identification of the Fraction of Indolent Tumors and Associated Overdiagnosis in Breast Cancer Screening Trials.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Roman Gulati; Marisa C Eisenberg; Yu Shen; E Shelley Hwang; Ruth B Etzioni
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Translation of research results to simple estimates of the likely effect of a lung cancer screening programme in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  S W Duffy; J K Field; P C Allgood; A Seigneurin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Necdet B Gunsoy; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Sue M Moss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Joint models of tumour size and lymph node spread for incident breast cancer cases in the presence of screening.

Authors:  Gabriel Isheden; Linda Abrahamsson; Therese Andersson; Kamila Czene; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Estimating latent, dynamic processes of breast cancer tumour growth and distant metastatic spread from mammography screening data.

Authors:  Alessandro Gasparini; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.