| Literature DB >> 20356378 |
Tao Wang1, Su-Xia Han, Shang-Fu Zhang, Yun-Ye Ning, Lei Chen, Ya-Juan Chen, Guang-Ming He, Dan Xu, Jin An, Ting Yang, Xiao-Hong Zhang, Fu-Qiang Wen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Chymase has been shown to function in the enzymatic production of angiotensin II (AngII) and the activation of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 in the cardiovascular system. The aim of this study was to determine the potential role of chymase in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary artery remodeling and PAH.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20356378 PMCID: PMC2853423 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Cigarette smoke-induced changes in pulmonary vascular and alveolar morphology and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). (a) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of small pulmonary vessels (original magnification × 40). (b) Representative Masson's trichrome staining of small pulmonary vessels (original magnification × 40). (c) Emphysema-like lesions in the lung after smoke exposure (H&E staining, original magnification × 20). (d) Medial wall thickness (MWT) of pulmonary arterioles. (e) RVSP in hamsters. Con: control group; CS: cigarette smoke-exposed group. Scale bars = 100 μm. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). * P < 0.05, significant difference from the control group.
Figure 2Changes in chymase protein and mRNA levels in hamster lungs. (a) Representative chymase immunohistochemical staining in pulmonary arterioles (original magnification × 40). (b) Representative Western blotting analysis of chymase protein levels in hamster lungs. (c) Representative RT-PCR analysis of chymase mRNA levels in hamster lungs. Con: control group; CS: cigarette smoke-exposed group. Scale bars = 100 μm. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3 for control group and n = 4 for smoke-exposed group). * P < 0.05, significant difference from the control group.
Figure 3Changes of chymase-like and ACE activities after chymase inhibition with chymostatin in hamster lungs. (a) Chymase-like activity. (b) ACE activity. Control: control group; CS: cigarette smoke-exposed group; 1 mg/kg Chymo: hamsters treated with 1 mg/kg chymostatin alone; 2 mg/kg Chymo: hamsters treated with 2 mg/kg chymostatin alone; CS + 1 mg/kg Chymo: hamsters treated with cigarette smoke plus 1 mg/kg Chymostatin; CS + 2 mg/kg Chymo: hamsters treated with cigarette smoke plus 2 mg/kg Chymostatin. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). * P < 0.05, significant difference from the control group. # P < 0.05, significant difference from the smoke-exposed group.
Figure 4Changes in the remodeling of pulmonary arterioles and RVSP after chymase inhibition with chymostatin. (a) Representative van Gieson's elastic staining of small pulmonary vessels (original magnification × 40). Scale bars = 100 μm. Con: control; CS: cigarette smoke exposure; Chy: treatment with 2 mg/kg chymostatin alone; CS+Chy: treatment with smoke exposure plus 2 mg/kg chymostatin. (b) MWT of pulmonary arterioles. (c) RVSP. Control: control group; CS: cigarette smoke-exposed group; Chymo: chymostatin treatment. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). * P < 0.05, significant difference from the control group. # P < 0.05, significant difference from the smoke-exposed group.
Figure 5Changes in Ang II levels and TGF-β1/Smad signaling activation in hamster lungs. (a) Ang II levels. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). (b) Protein levels of TGF-β1, β-actin, p-Smad2, Smad2, p-Smad3 and Smad3 measured by Western blotting analysis. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Relative protein levels were assessed by densitometry. Control: control group; CS: cigarette smoke-exposed group; Chymo: chymostatin treatment. * P < 0.05, significant difference from the control group. # P < 0.05, significant difference from the smoke-exposed group.