Literature DB >> 20356090

Life cycle assessment of high-rate anaerobic treatment, microbial fuel cells, and microbial electrolysis cells.

Jeffrey M Foley1, René A Rozendal, Christopher K Hertle, Paul A Lant, Korneel Rabaey.   

Abstract

Existing wastewater treatment options are generally perceived as energy intensive and environmentally unfriendly. Much attention has been focused on two new approaches in the past years, (i) microbial fuel cells and (ii) microbial electrolysis cells, which directly generate electrical current or chemical products, respectively, during wastewater treatment. These systems are commonly denominated as bioelectrochemical systems, and a multitude of claims have been made in the past regarding the environmental impact of these treatment options. However, an in-depth study backing these claims has not been performed. Here, we have conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impact of three industrial wastewater treatment options, (i) anaerobic treatment with biogas generation, (ii) a microbial fuel cell treatment, with direct electricity generation, and (iii) a microbial electrolysis cell, with hydrogen peroxide production. Our analysis showed that a microbial fuel cell does not provide a significant environmental benefit relative to the "conventional" anaerobic treatment option. However, a microbial electrolysis cell provides significant environmental benefits through the displacement of chemical production by conventional means. Provided that the target conversion level of 1000 A.m(-3) can be met, the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and other environmentally harmful emissions (e.g., aromatic hydrocarbons) of the microbial electrolysis cell will be a key driver for the development of an industrial standard for this technology. Evidently, this assessment is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions, such as the used reactor materials and target performance. This provides a challenge and an opportunity for researchers in the field to select and develop appropriate and environmentally benign materials of construction, as well as demonstrate the required 1000 A.m(-3) performance at pilot and full scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20356090     DOI: 10.1021/es100125h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  15 in total

Review 1.  Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; René A Rozendal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Light-driven carbon dioxide reduction to methane by nitrogenase in a photosynthetic bacterium.

Authors:  Kathryn R Fixen; Yanning Zheng; Derek F Harris; Sudipta Shaw; Zhi-Yong Yang; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt; Caroline S Harwood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Life cycle assessment of a bioelectrochemical system as a new technological platform for biosuccinic acid production from waste.

Authors:  Amandine Foulet; Théodore Bouchez; Elie Desmond-Le Quéméner; Lucas Giard; Laure Renvoisé; Lynda Aissani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Enabling unbalanced fermentations by using engineered electrode-interfaced bacteria.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Flynn; Daniel E Ross; Kristopher A Hunt; Daniel R Bond; Jeffrey A Gralnick
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.867

5.  High rate copper and energy recovery in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Pau Rodenas Motos; Annemiek Ter Heijne; Renata van der Weijden; Michel Saakes; Cees J N Buisman; Tom H J A Sleutels
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Bioelectrochemical production of hydrogen in an innovative pressure-retarded osmosis/microbial electrolysis cell system: experiments and modeling.

Authors:  Heyang Yuan; Yaobin Lu; Ibrahim M Abu-Reesh; Zhen He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 7.  Extracellular electron transfer from cathode to microbes: application for biofuel production.

Authors:  Okkyoung Choi; Byoung-In Sang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  A novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor as a potential net energy producer for sustainable wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Yun-Kun Wang; Guo-Ping Sheng; Bing-Jing Shi; Wen-Wei Li; Han-Qing Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Genome Scale Mutational Analysis of Geobacter sulfurreducens Reveals Distinct Molecular Mechanisms for Respiration and Sensing of Poised Electrodes versus Fe(III) Oxides.

Authors:  Chi Ho Chan; Caleb E Levar; Fernanda Jiménez-Otero; Daniel R Bond
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Energy Efficiency and Productivity Enhancement of Microbial Electrosynthesis of Acetate.

Authors:  Edward V LaBelle; Harold D May
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.