Literature DB >> 20355348

Less-than-standard treatment in rectal cancer patients: which patients are at risk?

Maria Pisu1, Lisa C Richardson, Young-Il Kim, Helen Krontiras, Michelle Y Martin, Maribel Salas, Lori A Pollack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend that patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer receive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (XRT) after surgery (especially if stage II and III). Studies reported that 90% of stage II and III patients received surgery, and 70% received adjuvant treatment. In states where socioeconomics and limited medical resources may hinder treatment, cancer care is understudied. The objective is to describe initiation and completion of rectal cancer treatment in Alabama.
METHODS: Medicare claims were obtained for 675 stage I to III rectal cancer patients diagnosed in 1999-2003, enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare, and with at least 9 months of followup. Logistic regressions were used to identify significant differences by sex, age, and race in the likelihood of initiating treatment and receiving an incomplete course of chemotherapy or XRT (< or = 120 days of chemotherapy and < or = 28 days of XRT).
RESULTS: Overall, 90% received surgery, of which 43% received some adjuvant treatment. Among stage II to III patients, 58.8% received adjuvant treatment. Except for patients aged 75 years and greater being less likely to start chemotherapy, there were no significant differences in initiation by age, sex, and race. Depending on concurrent administration of chemotherapy and XRT, 29% to 35% received incomplete chemotherapy, and 16% to 23% incomplete XRT. Women were more likely to have incomplete chemotherapy than men.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant treatment was less than reported in previous studies. Treatment initiation and completion did not differ across demographic factors. Future studies should explore reasons why older rectal cancer patients in Alabama are less likely to receive recommended treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20355348     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30525-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  4 in total

1.  Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a national comprehensive cancer network analysis.

Authors:  Polina Khrizman; Joyce C Niland; Anna ter Veer; Dana Milne; Kelli Bullard Dunn; William E Carson; Paul F Engstrom; Stephen Shibata; John M Skibber; Martin R Weiser; Deborah Schrag; Al B Benson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Meeting the information needs of lower income cancer survivors: results of a randomized control trial evaluating the american cancer society's "I can cope".

Authors:  Michelle Y Martin; Mary B Evans; Polly Kratt; Lori A Pollack; Judith Lee Smith; Robert Oster; Mark Dignan; Heather Prayor-Patterson; Christopher Watson; Peter Houston; Shiquina Andrews; Amandiy Liwo; Tung Sung Tseng; Sandral Hullett; Joann Oliver; Maria Pisu
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-01-16

Review 3.  Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eboneé N Butler; Neetu Chawla; Jennifer Lund; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

4.  What do cancer patients worry about when making decisions about treatment? Variation across racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Michelle Y Martin; Mona N Fouad; Robert A Oster; Deborah Schrag; Julie Urmie; Sara Sanders; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.