DiJon R Fasoli1, Mark E Glickman, Susan V Eisen. 1. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA. dfasoli@bu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though demand for mental health services (MHS) among US veterans is increasing, MHS utilization per veteran is decreasing. With health and social service needs competing for limited resources, it is important to understand the association between patient factors, MHS utilization, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We use a framework based on Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization to examine predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and clinical need as predictors of MHS utilization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of veterans receiving inpatient or outpatient MHS through Veterans Administration programs. Clinician ratings (Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF]) and self-report assessments (Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24) were completed for 421 veterans at enrollment and 3 months later. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine: (1) predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and need as predictors of MHS inpatient, residential, and outpatient utilization and (2) the association between individual characteristics, utilization, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Being older, female, having greater clinical need, lack of enabling resources (employment, stable housing, and social support), and easy access to treatment significantly predicted greater MHS utilization at 3-month follow-up. Less clinical need and no inpatient psychiatric hospitalization predicted better GAF and Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24 scores. White race and residential treatment also predicted better GAF scores. Neither enabling resources, nor number of outpatient mental health visits predicted clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This application of Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization confirmed associations between some predisposing characteristics, need, and enabling resources on MHS utilization but only predisposing characteristics, need, and utilization were associated with clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Though demand for mental health services (MHS) among US veterans is increasing, MHS utilization per veteran is decreasing. With health and social service needs competing for limited resources, it is important to understand the association between patient factors, MHS utilization, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We use a framework based on Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization to examine predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and clinical need as predictors of MHS utilization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of veterans receiving inpatient or outpatientMHS through Veterans Administration programs. Clinician ratings (Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF]) and self-report assessments (Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24) were completed for 421 veterans at enrollment and 3 months later. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine: (1) predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and need as predictors of MHS inpatient, residential, and outpatient utilization and (2) the association between individual characteristics, utilization, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Being older, female, having greater clinical need, lack of enabling resources (employment, stable housing, and social support), and easy access to treatment significantly predicted greater MHS utilization at 3-month follow-up. Less clinical need and no inpatient psychiatric hospitalization predicted better GAF and Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24 scores. White race and residential treatment also predicted better GAF scores. Neither enabling resources, nor number of outpatient mental health visits predicted clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This application of Andersen's behavioral model of health service utilization confirmed associations between some predisposing characteristics, need, and enabling resources on MHS utilization but only predisposing characteristics, need, and utilization were associated with clinical outcomes.
Authors: Lisa A Gorman; Rebecca K Sripada; Dara Ganoczy; Heather M Walters; Kipling M Bohnert; Gregory W Dalack; Marcia Valenstein Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Lincy Subha Lal; Amy Zhuang; Frank Hung; Chun Feng; Rebecca Arbuckle; Michael J Fisch Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rebecca K Sripada; Amy S B Bohnert; Alan R Teo; Debra S Levine; Paul N Pfeiffer; Nicholas W Bowersox; Mark S Mizruchi; Stephen T Chermack; Dara Ganoczy; Heather Walters; Marcia Valenstein Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Maria K Mor; Gretchen L Haas; Adam J Gordon; John P Cashy; James H Schaefer; Leslie R M Hausmann Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Susan V Eisen; Mark R Schultz; Dawne Vogt; Mark E Glickman; A Rani Elwy; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Princess E Osei-Bonsu; James Martin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Emily M Johnson; Kimberly A Barrie; Kyle Possemato; Michael Wade; April Eaker; Paige C Ouimette Journal: Mil Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Georg Schomerus; Katja Appel; Peter J Meffert; Melanie Luppa; Ronald M Andersen; Hans J Grabe; Sebastian E Baumeister Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-12-25 Impact factor: 4.328