Literature DB >> 20355164

SARCOSYL-PAGE: a new method for the detection of MIRCERA- and EPO-doping in blood.

Christian Reichel1, Friedrich Abzieher, Thomas Geisendorfer.   

Abstract

The detection of doping with MIRCERA (the brand name for Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator, or CERA) is hampered by the limited excretion of the rather large molecule (approximately 60 kDa) in urine. Blood (serum, plasma) in combination with sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) appears to be the ideal matrix for detecting all forms of doping with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) because the apparent molecular masses of ESAs are different from the mass of human serum erythropoietin (shEPO). While SDS-PAGE has proven the most sensitive method for the detection of doping with Dynepo, the sensitivity of SDS-PAGE for MIRCERA is drastically decreased. By exchanging the SDS for SARCOSYL (SAR) in the sample and running buffers the sensitivity problem was solved. SARCOSYL, a methyl glycine-based anionic surfactant, is only binding to the protein-part of MIRCERA but not to its polyethylene glycol (PEG)-chain, while SDS binds to both parts. In consequence, the monoclonal anti-EPO antibody (clone AE7A5) no longer interacts with the fully SDS-solubilized MIRCERA molecules. Only those molecules that contain SDS bound to the protein-chain are detected. Due to the inability of SARCOSYL to solubilize PEG-molecules, MIRCERA can be detected on SARCOSYL-PAGE with the same sensitivity as non-PEGylated epoetins. In a typical SAR-PAGE experiment, 200 microL of serum are used, which allows the direct detection of MIRCERA, recombinant epoetins (such as NeoRecormon, Dynepo, NESP), and shEPO in a single experiment and with high (i.e. femtogram) sensitivity. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20355164     DOI: 10.1002/dta.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  3 in total

1.  Antidoping programme and biological monitoring before and during the 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil.

Authors:  Norbert Baume; Nicolas Jan; Caroline Emery; Béatrice Mandanis; Carine Schweizer; Sylvain Giraud; Nicolas Leuenberger; François Marclay; Raul Nicoli; Laurent Perrenoud; Neil Robinson; Jiri Dvorak; Martial Saugy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of detection methods for erythropoietin doping in cyclists.

Authors:  Jules A A C Heuberger; Peter van Eenoo; Joris I Rotmans; Pim Gal; Frederik E Stuurman; Titiaan E Post; Johannes M A Daniels; Herman Ram; Olivier de Hon; Jacobus Burggraaf; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.345

Review 3.  The uefa euro 2012 anti-doping programme - scientific review.

Authors:  M Earl; M Vouillamoz; D Kwiatkowska; E Turek-Lepa; A Pokrywka; M Saugy; N Baume; G Gmeiner
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.806

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.