Literature DB >> 20354924

The impact of the lung allocation score.

Stephenie M Takahashi1, Edward R Garrity.   

Abstract

The lung allocation score (LAS) was developed in an effort to facilitate lung transplantation to more urgent and ill patients, to decrease wait time, and to change the allocation process to a more merit-based system. Four years after the implementation of the LAS, we now evaluate the impact and outcomes of this system. We have found that registrations on the wait list as well as wait time have decreased. Mortality on the wait list has decreased. There has been significant change in the distribution of diagnoses receiving transplantation with no significant difference in survival in most areas. Patients with higher LAS scores have increased short-term mortality. The LAS has affected the allocation process as well as significant outcomes in the transplant patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354924     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1069-3424            Impact factor:   3.119


  8 in total

Review 1.  Lung transplantation: recent developments and future challenges.

Authors:  Hari R Mallidi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  Variability in donor organ offer acceptance and lung transplantation survival.

Authors:  Michael S Mulvihill; Hui J Lee; Jeremy Weber; Ashley Y Choi; Morgan L Cox; Babatunde A Yerokun; Muath A Bishawi; Jacob Klapper; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Characteristics of patients with pulmonary venoocclusive disease awaiting transplantation.

Authors:  Keith M Wille; Nirmal S Sharma; Tejaswini Kulkarni; Matthew R Lammi; Joseph B Barney; S Christopher Bellot; Ryan S Cantor; David C Naftel; Enrique Diaz-Guzman; David C McGiffin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-11

Review 4.  Bridge to lung transplantation and rescue post-transplant: the expanding role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Brian C Gulack; Sameer A Hirji; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Historical perspectives of lung transplantation: connecting the dots.

Authors:  Tanmay S Panchabhai; Udit Chaddha; Kenneth R McCurry; Ross M Bremner; Atul C Mehta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Disparities in lung transplantation before and after introduction of the lung allocation score.

Authors:  Keith M Wille; Kathy F Harrington; Joao A deAndrade; Sonia Vishin; Robert A Oster; Richard A Kaslow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Is SAPS 3 better than APACHE II at predicting mortality in critically ill transplant patients?

Authors:  Vanessa M de Oliveira; Janete S Brauner; Edison Rodrigues Filho; Ruth G A Susin; Viviane Draghetti; Simone T Bolzan; Silvia R R Vieira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 8.  Timing it right: the challenge of recipient selection for lung transplantation.

Authors:  Henry W Ainge-Allen; Allan R Glanville
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.