Literature DB >> 20354877

Minimally invasive colorectal resection is associated with a rapid and sustained decrease in plasma levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in the colon cancer setting.

Michael J Grieco1, H M C Shantha Kumara, Raymond Baxter, Nadav Dujovny, Matthew F Kalady, Vesna Cekic, Martin Luchtefeld, Richard L Whelan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates tumor growth directly via tumor cell EGF receptors or indirectly via its proangiogenic effects. This study's purpose was to determine the impact of minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) on postoperative (postop) plasma EGF levels in the colorectal cancer (CRC) and benign disease settings and to see if preoperative (PreOp) EGF levels are altered in cancer patients.
METHODS: MICR patients with benign pathology (n = 40) and CRC (n = 48) had blood samples taken PreOp and on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3. In some patients, late samples were taken between POD7 and POD60; these were bundled into 7-day blocks and considered as single time points. EGF levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and results were reported as mean ± SD after logarithmic transformation. The Student t test was used (p < 0.008 after Bonferroni correction).
RESULTS: The cancer and benign groups were comparable except for age. The mean PreOp CRC plasma EGF level (122.9 ± 75.9 pg/ml) was significantly higher than that of the benign group (85.3 ± 38.5 pg/ml) (p = 0.015). The cancer group's EGF levels were significantly decreased on POD1 and POD3 and for the POD31-55 time point (mean EGF level = 63.1 ± 42.2 (n = 10). The benign group's POD3 and POD7-14 EGF levels were significantly lower than the PreOp level; later levels returned toward baseline. Small late sample size limited analysis.
CONCLUSION: Plasma EGF levels are significantly higher in cancer patients. MICR is associated with a significant decrease in EGF levels early postop in both cancer and benign settings. Unlike the benign group, EGF blood levels in cancer patients remain low during the second postop month. A larger study with more late samples is needed to verify these results. EGF may have value as a tumor marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354877     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1018-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Proceedings: Tumor angiogenesis factor.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor phosphorylation by AEE788 reduces growth and metastasis of human colon carcinoma in an orthotopic nude mouse model.

Authors:  Kenji Yokoi; Premal H Thaker; Sertac Yazici; Robert R Rebhun; Do-Hyun Nam; Junqin He; Sun-Jin Kim; James L Abbruzzese; Stanley R Hamilton; Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor gene but no evidence of ras mutations in primary human esophageal cancers.

Authors:  M C Hollstein; A M Smits; C Galiana; H Yamasaki; J L Bos; A Mandard; C Partensky; R Montesano
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Effects of longterm epidermal growth factor treatment on the normal rat colon.

Authors:  P Kissmeyer-Nielsen; L Vinter-Jensen; M Smerup
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Quantitative estimation of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB-2 in human breast cancer.

Authors:  K W Robertson; J R Reeves; G Smith; W N Keith; B W Ozanne; T G Cooke; P D Stanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Amplification and overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J Ishikawa; S Maeda; K Umezu; T Sugiyama; S Kamidono
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Persistent elevation of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels during the first month after minimally invasive colorectal resection.

Authors:  A Belizon; E Balik; P Horst; D Feingold; T Arnell; T Azarani; V Cekic; R Skitt; S Kumara; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Do operations facilitate tumor growth? An experimental model in rats.

Authors:  J L Weese; F D Ottery; S E Emoto
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Colorectal resection is associated with persistent proangiogenic plasma protein changes: postoperative plasma stimulates in vitro endothelial cell growth, migration, and invasion.

Authors:  H M C Shantha Kumara; H M C Shantha Kumara; Daniel Feingold; Matthew Kalady; Nadav Dujovny; Anthony Senagore; Neil Hyman; Vesna Cekic; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  J W Kim; Y T Kim; D K Kim; C H Song; J W Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  2 in total

1.  Linking epidermal growth factor plasma levels with the prognosis and treatment response of colorectal cancer patients treated with a minimally invasive approach: does it have clinical utility?

Authors:  John Spiliotis; Odysseas Zoras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Serum PlGF and EGF are independent prognostic markers in non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Schölch; Andreas Bogner; Ulrich Bork; Mohammad Rahbari; Balázs Győrffy; Martin Schneider; Christoph Reissfelder; Jürgen Weitz; Nuh N Rahbari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.