Literature DB >> 2035461

Body composition in elderly people: effect of criterion estimates on predictive equations.

R N Baumgartner1, S B Heymsfield, S Lichtman, J Wang, R N Pierson.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine whether there are significant differences between two- and four-compartment model estimates of body composition, whether these differences are associated with aqueous and mineral fractions of the fat-free mass (FFM); and whether the differences are retained in equations for predicting body composition from anthropometry and bioelectric resistance. Body composition was estimated in 98 men and women aged 65-94 y by using a four-compartment model based on hydrodensitometry, 3H2O dilution, and dual-photon absorptiometry. These estimates were significantly different from those obtained by using Siri's two-compartment model. The differences were associated significantly (P less than 0.0001) with variation in the aqueous fraction of FFM. Equations for predicting body composition from anthropometry and resistance, when calibrated against two-compartment model estimates, retained these systematic errors. Equations predicting body composition in elderly people should be calibrated against estimates from multicompartment models that consider variability in FFM composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2035461     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/53.6.1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  32 in total

1.  Smaller size of high metabolic rate organs explains lower resting energy expenditure in Asian-Indian Than Chinese men.

Authors:  L L T Song; K Venkataraman; P Gluckman; Y S Chong; M-W L Chee; C M Khoo; M-Ks Leow; Y S Lee; E S Tai; E Y H Khoo
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Estimating body fat in NCAA Division I female athletes: a five-compartment model validation of laboratory methods.

Authors:  Jordan R Moon; Joan M Eckerson; Sarah E Tobkin; Abbie E Smith; Christopher M Lockwood; Ashley A Walter; Joel T Cramer; Travis W Beck; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Multi-component molecular-level body composition reference methods: evolving concepts and future directions.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; C B Ebbeling; J Zheng; A Pietrobelli; B J Strauss; A M Silva; D S Ludwig
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 4.  The multidomain mobility lab in older persons: from bench to bedside. The assessment of body composition in older persons at risk of mobility limitations.

Authors:  Andrea P Rossi; Tamara B Harris; Francesco Fantin; Fabio Armellini; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance.

Authors:  Catia Martins; Barbara A Gower; James O Hill; Gary R Hunter
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Evaluation of body composition. Current issues.

Authors:  V H Heyward
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Body composition analysis in older adults with dementia. Anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis: a critical review.

Authors:  M A Camina Martín; B de Mateo Silleras; M P Redondo del Río
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Accuracy of DXA in estimating body composition changes in elite athletes using a four compartment model as the reference method.

Authors:  Diana A Santos; Analiza M Silva; Catarina N Matias; David A Fields; Steven B Heymsfield; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 9.  Body composition assessment in the infant.

Authors:  Ellen W Demerath; David A Fields
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 1.937

10.  Proximal electrode placement improves the estimation of body composition in obese and lean elderly during segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Authors:  Yosuke Yamada; Yoshihisa Masuo; Keiichi Yokoyama; Yukako Hashii; Soichi Ando; Yasuko Okayama; Taketoshi Morimoto; Misaka Kimura; Shingo Oda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.