Literature DB >> 20354238

Sterilization decision making among medically at-risk obese pregnant women.

Marie Hastings-Tolsma1, Lauren Clark, Priscilla Nodine, Stephanie Teal.   

Abstract

In this article, we describe a study using a qualitative, naturalistic grounded theory design to explore sterilization decision making by pregnant obese women. Semistructured interviews of women who intended to undergo sterilization at the time of delivery were conducted in the third trimester of pregnancy (n = 15) and again postpartum (n = 11). The decision for sterilization was based on personal criteria for family composition and the nature of each woman's relationship with her partner. The process of decision making began with developing a personal comfort with cessation of childbearing, followed by social confirmation, informing the provider, and then awaiting the procedure. Sterilization was seen as reversible, despite a desire for "something permanent." Obesity was rarely viewed as related to any part of the decision for or against sterilization, and was rarely discussed by providers. Participants made sterilization decisions in their personal and social contexts, and then shared the decision with their providers, whom they often perceived as challenging that decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354238     DOI: 10.1177/1049732310364626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  2 in total

1.  Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Grounded Theory Research.

Authors:  Claire Burke Draucker; Halima Al-Khattab; Dana D Hines; Jill Mazurczyk; Anne C Russell; Pam Shockey Stephenson; Shannon Draucker
Journal:  Qual Rep       Date:  2014-04-28

2.  Perceptions of risk and influences of choice in pregnant women with obesity. An evidence synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Sophie Relph; Melissa Ong; Matias C Vieira; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Jane Sandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.