Literature DB >> 20353687

Moving research to patient applications through commercialization: understanding and evaluating the role of intellectual property.

Robert M Patino1.   

Abstract

The advancement of research from discovery to the delivery of medical care can be limited without the support of industry to sponsor its continued development. Federal government financial support is generally crucial in early-stage development through funding from the NIH, National Science Foundation, and other federal agencies; however, government support generally stops shortly after basic research discoveries have been reported. Much of the cessation of financial support derives from the government's regulatory responsibilities, as sponsoring the commercialization of a product conflicts with regulation of the approval for clinical use of a drug or device. Furthermore, differences in goals, resources, and flexibility render government, as compared with private industry, inefficient and less responsive to market demands with regard to stream-lining the development of and enhancing the quality of products and services offered. Thus, industry and private investment provide the bridge that converts new discoveries into healthcare products that are available to consumers and patients. This conversion occurs through commercialization, which involves both high risks and high rewards. Taking advantage of the commercialization option for research development requires an understanding of the technology transfer process. This article reviews 5 topics: 1) industry motivation to invest in academic research; 2) institutional considerations in partnering with industry; 3) academia's interactions with inventors in the commercialization process; 4) the research institution's route to commercialization, and 5) the role of intellectual property and commercialization in the advancement of healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20353687      PMCID: PMC2846000     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  3 in total

1.  Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd: implications of the supreme court's decision for the people who matter most...the consumer.

Authors:  Ian Jaquette
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2007

2.  Science and law. Intellectual property and human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Jeanne F Loring; Cathryn Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Intellectual property rights and research disclosure in the university environment: preserving the commercialization option and optimizing market interest.

Authors:  Robert Patino
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.232

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  How efficient is translational research in radiation oncology? The example of a large Dutch academic radiation oncology department.

Authors:  Maria Jacobs; Liesbeth Boersma; Frits V Merode; Andre Dekker; Frank Verhaegen; Luc Linden; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The EAES intellectual property awareness survey.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Nakajima; Yoav Mintz; Felix Nickel; Alberto Arezzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.