Literature DB >> 20353412

An anatomic-based approach for the placement of implantable loop recorders.

Blair P Grubb1, Marlene Welch, Khalil Kanjwal, Beverly Karabin, Yousuf Kanjwal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Placement of the Reveal implantable loop recorder (ILR; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) has previously involved preoperative cutaneous mapping to determine the optimal location. We describe an anatomic-based approach to ILR placement that does not require cutaneous mapping.
METHOD: A total of 63 patients (40 women, 23 men, mean age 38 ± 15 years) were included in the study. Each underwent implantation of a Reveal ILR in the left upper chest area midway between the supraclavicular notch and the left breast area. Thirty-two patients received a Medtronic Reveal DX ILR and 31 received Reveal XT device.
RESULTS: In all 62 patients, adequate electrocardiographic tracings were obtained at implant without the need for preoperative cutaneous mapping, and all were followed for a period of 10 ± 4 months afterwards. The mean P wave amplitude was 0.12 ± 0.20 mV at implant and at follow-up (6-14 months postimplant); the amplitude was 0.11 ± 0.19 mV. The peak-to-peak QRS amplitude was 0.48 ± 0.15 mV at implant and 0.44 ± 0.16 mV at a follow-up of 6-14 months. The P waves were not detected in two patients at follow-up. In one patient, decreased amplitude of QRS complex resulted in the autoactivation of the device and in one other patient noise was inappropriately oversensed and recorded.
CONCLUSION: A simple anatomic approach can be used for reveal ILR placement. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20353412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02747.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

1.  New implantable cardiac monitor with three-lead ECG and active noise detection.

Authors:  J Lauschke; M Busch; W Haverkamp; A Bulava; R Schneider; D Andresen; H Nägele; C Israel; G Hindricks; D Bänsch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Revisiting where to apply preimplant mapping to improve P-wave sensing of insertable cardiac monitors.

Authors:  Yuhei Kasai; Jungo Kasai; Syuichi Sahashi; Sandeep Shakya; Hiroki Kuji; Naoki Hayakawa; Kotaro Miyaji; Junji Kanda
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 3.  Cardiac monitoring in patients with syncope: making that elusive diagnosis.

Authors:  Rajesh Subbiah; Pow-Li Chia; Lorne J Gula; George J Klein; Allan C Skanes; Raymond Yee; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2013-11

4.  R-wave sensing in an implantable cardiac monitor without ECG-based preimplant mapping: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrew D Krahn; Robert A Pickett; Scott Sakaguchi; Naushad Shaik; Jian Cao; Holly S Norman; Patricia Guerrero
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 1.976

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.